Literature DB >> 27142626

Process of Pancreas Head as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery.

Nao Kobayashi1, Hisashi Shinohara2,3, Shusuke Haruta1, Yu Ohkura1, Aya Mizuno1, Masaki Ueno1, Harushi Udagawa1, Yoshiharu Sakai4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF)-often caused by pancreatic injury during dissection of the peripancreatic lymph nodes-is a serious complication after gastric cancer surgery. We defined protruding pancreatic tissue on the anterior side of the pancreas head as "process of the pancreas head" (PPH) and investigated whether PPH is a predictable risk factor for POPF after laparoscopic gastrectomy.
METHODS: We reviewed 255 patients who underwent laparoscopic total or distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The perioperative outcomes of 142 patients operated in the study's early phase were investigated to evaluate the risk factors for POPF. To evaluate whether preoperative identification of PPH by computed tomography (CT) and intraoperative prediction of pancreas head outline could reduce the risk of POPF, the outcomes of 113 patients operated in the late phase were assessed.
RESULTS: Of the 142 early-phase patients, PPH was identified intraoperatively in 38 patients (26.8 %). A total of 13 patients (9.1 %) developed POPF > grade 2. PPH was identified as a risk factor for POPF (P < 0.01). In early-phase patients with PPH, the POPF rate was 21.0 %; in the late phase, it decreased to 4.3 %. Further, the POPF rate in early-phase patients with BMI > 25 and PPH was 42.6 %, decreasing to 0 % in the late-phase patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of PPH is a risk factor for POPF after laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Identifying PPH using preoperative CT images and predicting the shape of the pancreas head during infrapyloric lymph node dissection are valuable in preventing POPF following laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27142626     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3536-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  16 in total

1.  Short-term surgical outcomes and operative risks of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric carcinoma: experience at a large-volume center.

Authors:  Oh Jeong; Seong Yeop Ryu; Xue-Feng Zhao; Mi Ran Jung; Kwang Yong Kim; Young Kyu Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Lymph node metastases of gastric cancer. General pattern in 1931 patients.

Authors:  K Maruyama; P Gunvén; K Okabayashi; M Sasako; T Kinoshita
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Tracing Dissectable Layers of Mesenteries Overcomes Embryologic Restrictions when Performing Infrapyloric Lymphadenectomy in Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Hisashi Shinohara; Shusuke Haruta; Yu Ohkura; Harushi Udagawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Current status of a randomized controlled trial examining laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Hitoshi Katai
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2015-02-10

5.  Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: from a viewpoint of pancreas-related complications.

Authors:  Kazutaka Obama; Hiroshi Okabe; Hisahiro Hosogi; Eiji Tanaka; Atsushi Itami; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  M Sasako; P McCulloch; T Kinoshita; K Maruyama
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula in curative gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Hyeong Won Yu; Do Hyun Jung; Sang-Yong Son; Chang Min Lee; Ju Hee Lee; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.720

8.  Complications with laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy: multivariate analysis of 300 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jong-Min Park; Sung-Ho Jin; Sang-Rim Lee; Hong Kim; In Ho Jung; Yong Kwan Cho; Sang-Uk Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leonie Haverkamp; Teus J Weijs; Pieter C van der Sluis; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Anatomical considerations of the infrapyloric artery and its associated lymph nodes during laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Shusuke Haruta; Hisashi Shinohara; Masaki Ueno; Harushi Udagawa; Yoshiharu Sakai; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 7.370

View more
  8 in total

1.  Impact of anatomical position of the pancreas on postoperative complications and drain amylase concentrations after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Koshi Kumagai; Naoki Hiki; Souya Nunobe; Satoshi Kamiya; Masahiro Tsujiura; Satoshi Ida; Manabu Ohashi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Takeshi Sano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Giuseppe Giuliani; Martina Iacobone; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Intraoperative Body Fluid Amylase as a Novel Indicator of Postgastrectomy Pancreatic Fistula.

Authors:  Toshiro Tanioka; Kazuyuki Kojima; Toshifumi Saito; Emi Kanemoto; Keisuke Okuno; Kentaro Gokita; Kenta Kobayashi; Masatoshi Nakagawa; Mikito Inokuchi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  An advanced bipolar device helps reduce the rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula in laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Kazunori Shibao; Shinsaku Honda; Yasuhiro Adachi; Shiro Kohi; Yuzan Kudou; Nobutaka Matayoshi; Nagahiro Sato; Keiji Hirata
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Unplanned reoperation after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: causes, risk factors, and long-term prognostic influence.

Authors:  Xueliang Zuo; Juan Cai; Zhiqiang Chen; Yao Zhang; Jian Wu; Liangyu Wu; Jinguo Wang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Robotic radical lymphadenectomy without touching the pancreas during gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toshiyasu Ojima; Masaki Nakamura; Mikihito Nakamori; Keiji Hayata; Masahiro Katsuda; Shimpei Maruoka; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Postoperative nutritional outcomes and quality of life-related complications of proximal versus total gastrectomy for upper-third early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Inhyeok Lee; Youjin Oh; Shin- Hoo Park; Yeongkeun Kwon; Sungsoo Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Pancreatic Fistula after D1+/D2 Radical Gastrectomy according to the Updated International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery Criteria: Risk Factors and Clinical Consequences. Experience of Surgeons with High Caseloads in a Single Surgical Center in Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Alexandru Martiniuc; Traian Dumitrascu; Mihnea Ionescu; Stefan Tudor; Monica Lacatus; Vlad Herlea; Catalin Vasilescu
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.720

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.