Literature DB >> 24156038

Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula in curative gastric cancer surgery.

Hyeong Won Yu1, Do Hyun Jung, Sang-Yong Son, Chang Min Lee, Ju Hee Lee, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Postoperative pancreatic fistula is a dreadful complication after gastric cancer surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the actual incidence and risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 900 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer (laparoscopic gastrectomy, 594 patients; open gastrectomy 306 patients) were enrolled between January 2009 and December 2010. Clinical outcomes, including postoperative pancreatic fistula grade based on the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula, were investigated.
RESULTS: Overall, the postoperative pancreatic fistula rate was 3.3% (30/900) (1.5% in laparoscopic gastrectomy versus 6.9% in open gastrectomy, P<0.001). Patients who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy, total gastrectomy, splenectomy or distal pancreatectomy showed higher postoperative pancreatic fistula rates (4.7%, 13.8%, 13.6%, or 57.1%, respectively, P<0.001). Patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula had higher morbidity (46.7% versus 13.1%, P<0.001), delayed gas out (4.9 days versus 3.8 days, P<0.001), belated diet start (5.8 days versus 3.5 days, P<0.001) and longer postoperative hospital stay (13.7 days versus 6.8 days, P<0.001). On the multivariate analysis, total gastrectomy (odds ratio 9.751, 95% confidence interval: 3.348 to 28.397, P<0.001), distal pancreatectomy (odds ratio 7.637, 95% confidence interval: 1.668 to 34.961, P=0.009) and open gastrectomy (odds ratio 2.934, 95% confidence interval: 1.100 to 7.826, P=0.032) were the independent risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic gastrectomy had an advantage over open gastrectomy in terms of the lower postoperative pancreatic fistula rate. Total gastrectomy and combined resection, such as distal pancreatectomy, should be performed carefully to minimize postoperative pancreatic fistula in gastric cancer surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastrectomy; Pancreatic fistula; Risk factors; Stomach cancer

Year:  2013        PMID: 24156038      PMCID: PMC3804677          DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2013.13.3.179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1598-1320            Impact factor:   3.720


  20 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  Do Joong Park; Sang-Uk Han; Woo Jin Hyung; Min Chan Kim; Wook Kim; Seong Yeob Ryu; Seung-Wan Ryu; Kyo Young Song; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Gyu-Seok Cho; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Amylase concentration of drainage fluid after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  T Sano; M Sasako; H Katai; K Maruyama
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Sang-Il Lee; Yoo-Shin Choi; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang; Min-Chan Kim
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy with radical lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: from a viewpoint of pancreas-related complications.

Authors:  Kazutaka Obama; Hiroshi Okabe; Hisahiro Hosogi; Eiji Tanaka; Atsushi Itami; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Predictors of operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  D J Park; H-J Lee; H-H Kim; H-K Yang; K U Lee; K J Choe
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Comparison of complications after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Authors:  Ju-Hee Lee; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Moon-Soo Lee; Ju-Hee Lee; Do Joong Park; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Hyung-Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Daisuke Nobuoka; Naoto Gotohda; Masaru Konishi; Toshio Nakagohri; Shinichiro Takahashi; Taira Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 10.  Gastric cancer epidemiology and risk factors.

Authors:  Douglas E Guggenheim; Manish A Shah
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  14 in total

1.  Predictive value of drain amylase content for peripancreatic inflammatory fluid collections after laparoscopic (assisted) distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Mitsuro Kanda; Michitaka Fujiwara; Chie Tanaka; Daisuke Kobayashi; Naoki Iwata; Akira Mizuno; Suguru Yamada; Tsutomu Fujii; Goro Nakayama; Hiroyuki Sugimoto; Masahiko Koike; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A Multi-institutional, Prospective, Phase II Feasibility Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901).

Authors:  Noriyuki Inaki; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Tetsuji Ohyama; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Natsuya Katada; Keisuke Koeda; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Akinori Takagane; Kazuyuki Kojima; Shinichi Sakuramoto; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Koichi Suda; Mariko Man-I; Yoshinori Ishida; Yuichiro Kawamura; Seiji Satoh; Ichiro Uyama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The role of bursectomy in the surgical management of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Konstantinos Perivoliotis; Ioannis Baloyiannis; Dimitrios Symeonidis; Konstantinos Tepetes
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-06-03

Review 5.  Management of postoperative complications of lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Leandro Cardoso Barchi; Amir Zeide Charruf; Rodrigo José de Oliveira; Carlos Eduardo Jacob; Ivan Cecconello; Bruno Zilberstein
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-12-27

Review 6.  Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Giuseppe Giuliani; Martina Iacobone; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Reducing the risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula in radical gastrectomy: pre-assessment with computed tomography for the diagnosis of pancreatic steatosis.

Authors:  Nao Kobayashi; Hisashi Shinohara; Shusuke Haruta; Harushi Udagawa; Masaki Ueno
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Short-term outcomes of D2 lymphadenectomy plus complete mesogastric excision for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Dayong Zhao; Jiao Deng; Beibei Cao; Jie Shen; Liang Liu; Aitang Xiao; Ping Yin; Daxing Xie; Jianping Gong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.453

9.  Process of Pancreas Head as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in Laparoscopic Gastric Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Nao Kobayashi; Hisashi Shinohara; Shusuke Haruta; Yu Ohkura; Aya Mizuno; Masaki Ueno; Harushi Udagawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of proximal and distal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xuefeng Yu; Fulan Hu; Chunfeng Li; Qiang Yao; Hongfeng Zhang; Yingwei Xue
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.