Toshiro Tanioka1,2, Kazuyuki Kojima3,4, Toshifumi Saito3,4, Emi Kanemoto3,4, Keisuke Okuno3,4, Kentaro Gokita3,4, Kenta Kobayashi3, Masatoshi Nakagawa3, Mikito Inokuchi3. 1. Department of Gastric Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan. t-tanioka.srg1@tmd.ac.jp. 2. Department of Minimally Invasive Treatment, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan. t-tanioka.srg1@tmd.ac.jp. 3. Department of Gastric Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan. 4. Department of Minimally Invasive Treatment, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although many methods to prevent the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after gastrectomy have been reported, POPF can only be identified after it has occurred. Various therapeutic measures could be taken if signs of POPF could be detected intraoperatively. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in which we attempted to predict POPF by measuring the intraoperative amylase concentration in the peripancreatic body fluid. To collect the body fluid, three sponges were placed around the pancreas at lymph node station Nos. 6, 8, and 11 during lymphadenectomy. The amylase concentration was measured in the body fluid squeezed from the sponges. We investigated whether the intraoperative body fluid amylase concentration (IBAC) was associated with POPF formation. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients were enrolled from February 2016 to March 2018, and we analyzed 81 eligible patients. Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II POPF occurred in eight patients (9%). The IBAC was significantly higher in sponges No. 6 (P = 0.044) and No. 8 (P = 0.007). The incidence of POPF was predicted by using an IBAC cutoff value for No. 6 (1047 IU/L; sensitivity 87.5%; specificity 65.0%; positive likelihood ratio 2.5) and No. 8 (400 IU/L; sensitivity 87.5%; specificity 68.5%; positive likelihood value 2.8), respectively. The IBAC in sponge No. 11 tended to be higher (P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: By measuring the IBAC, surgeons might predict POPF easily and noninvasively during surgery. This method is one of the most effective ways to predict POPF intraoperatively.
BACKGROUND: Although many methods to prevent the development of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after gastrectomy have been reported, POPF can only be identified after it has occurred. Various therapeutic measures could be taken if signs of POPF could be detected intraoperatively. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in which we attempted to predict POPF by measuring the intraoperative amylase concentration in the peripancreatic body fluid. To collect the body fluid, three sponges were placed around the pancreas at lymph node station Nos. 6, 8, and 11 during lymphadenectomy. The amylase concentration was measured in the body fluid squeezed from the sponges. We investigated whether the intraoperative body fluid amylase concentration (IBAC) was associated with POPF formation. RESULTS: In total, 109 patients were enrolled from February 2016 to March 2018, and we analyzed 81 eligible patients. Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II POPF occurred in eight patients (9%). The IBAC was significantly higher in sponges No. 6 (P = 0.044) and No. 8 (P = 0.007). The incidence of POPF was predicted by using an IBAC cutoff value for No. 6 (1047 IU/L; sensitivity 87.5%; specificity 65.0%; positive likelihood ratio 2.5) and No. 8 (400 IU/L; sensitivity 87.5%; specificity 68.5%; positive likelihood value 2.8), respectively. The IBAC in sponge No. 11 tended to be higher (P = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: By measuring the IBAC, surgeons might predict POPF easily and noninvasively during surgery. This method is one of the most effective ways to predict POPF intraoperatively.