Literature DB >> 27141251

Finite element analysis on stress distribution of maxillary implant-retained overdentures depending on the Bar attachment design and palatal coverage.

Min-Jeong Kim1, Sung-Ok Hong2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of anchorage systems and palatal coverage of denture base on load transfer in maxillary implant-retained overdenture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Maxillary implant-retained overdentures with 4 implants placed in the anterior region of edentulous maxilla were converted into a 3-D numerical model, and stress distribution patterns in implant supporting bone in the case of unilateral vertical loading on maxillary right first molar were compared with each other depending on various types of anchorage system and palatal coverage extent of denture base using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
RESULTS: In all experimental models, the highest stress was concentrated on the most distal implant and implant supporting bone on loaded side. The stress at the most distal implant-supporting bone was concentrated on the cortical bone. In all anchorage system without palatal coverage of denture base, higher stresses were concentrated on the most distal implant and implant supporting bone on loaded side.
CONCLUSION: It could be suggested that when making maxillary implant retained overdenture, using Hader bar instead of milled bar and full palatal coverage rather than partial palatal coverage are more beneficial in distributing the stress that is applied on implant supporting bone.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attachment; Complete denture; Dental implants; Finite element analysis; Overdenture

Year:  2016        PMID: 27141251      PMCID: PMC4852271          DOI: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.2.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont        ISSN: 2005-7806            Impact factor:   1.904


  32 in total

1.  Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone.

Authors:  D Siegele; U Soltesz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis in and around the Screw-Vent implant.

Authors:  N L Clelland; Y H Ismail; H S Zaki; D Pipko
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Finite element analysis to compare complete denture and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems.

Authors:  Valentim Adelino Ricardo Barão; Wirley Gonçalves Assunção; Lucas Fernando Tabata; Juliana Aparecida Delben; Erica Alves Gomes; Edson Antonio Capello de Sousa; Eduardo Passos Rocha
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Maxillary implant-supported bar overdenture and mandibular implant-retained fixed denture using CAD/CAM technology and 3-D design software: a clinical report.

Authors:  Panagiota-Eirini Spyropoulou; Michael E Razzoog; Renée E Duff; Dimitrios Chronaios; Berna Saglik; Daler E Tarrazzi
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.426

5.  Rehabilitation of malpositioned implants with a CAD/CAM milled implant overdenture: a clinical report.

Authors:  Mauricio S Moeller; Renee E Duff; Michael E Razzoog
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.426

Review 6.  Management of the edentulous patient.

Authors:  R D Mericske-Stern; T D Taylor; U Belser
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants.

Authors:  J E Hutton; M R Heath; J Y Chai; J Harnett; T Jemt; R B Johns; S McKenna; D C McNamara; D van Steenberghe; R Taylor
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws.

Authors:  R L Sakaguchi; S E Borgersen
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses.

Authors:  S N White; A A Caputo; T Anderkvist
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses.

Authors:  R Skalak
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  2 in total

1.  A New Model to Study Fatigue in Dental Implants Based on Probabilistic Finite Elements and Cumulative Damage Model.

Authors:  María Prados-Privado; José Antonio Bea; Rosa Rojo; Sérgio A Gehrke; José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 1.781

2.  Stress distribution on different bar materials in implant-retained palatal obturator.

Authors:  Regina Furbino Villefort; João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; Alexandre Luiz Borges; Nívia Castro Binda; Carlos Eduardo de Almeida Ferreira; Marco Antonio Bottino; Sandra Lúcia Ventorim von Zeidler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.