Literature DB >> 27139323

Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Geoffrey A Manley1, Pim van Dijk2.   

Abstract

Frequency selectivity is a key functional property of the inner ear and since hearing research began, the frequency resolution of the human ear has been a central question. In contrast to animal studies, which permit invasive recording of neural activity, human studies must rely on indirect methods to determine hearing selectivity. Psychophysical studies, which used masking of a tone by other sounds, indicate a modest frequency selectivity in humans. By contrast, estimates using the phase delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAE) predict a remarkably high selectivity, unique among mammals. An alternative measure of cochlear frequency selectivity are suppression tuning curves of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE). Several animal studies show that these measures are in excellent agreement with neural frequency selectivity. Here we contribute a large data set from normal-hearing young humans on suppression tuning curves (STC) of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE). The frequency selectivities of human STC measured near threshold levels agree with the earlier, much lower, psychophysical estimates. They differ, however, from the typical patterns seen in animal auditory nerve data in that the selectivity is remarkably independent of frequency. In addition, SOAE are suppressed by higher-level tones in narrow frequency bands clearly above the main suppression frequencies. These narrow suppression bands suggest interactions between the suppressor tone and a cochlear standing wave corresponding to the SOAE frequency being suppressed. The data show that the relationship between pre-neural mechanical processing in the cochlea and neural coding at the hair-cell/auditory nerve synapse needs to be reconsidered.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frequency selectivity; Human hearing; Otoacoustic emissions

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27139323     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Aftereffects of Intense Low-Frequency Sound on Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions: Effect of Frequency and Level.

Authors:  Lena Jeanson; Lutz Wiegrebe; Robert Gürkov; Eike Krause; Markus Drexl
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-19

Review 2.  Comparative Auditory Neuroscience: Understanding the Evolution and Function of Ears.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-18

3.  The Elusive Cochlear Filter: Wave Origin of Cochlear Cross-Frequency Masking.

Authors:  Alessandro Altoè; Karolina K Charaziak; James B Dewey; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; John S Oghalai; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

Review 4.  A Functional Perspective on the Evolution of the Cochlea.

Authors:  Christine Köppl; Geoffrey A Manley
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 6.915

5.  High-resolution frequency tuning but not temporal coding in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Christian Desloovere; Philip X Joris
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Hearing loss genes reveal patterns of adaptive evolution at the coding and non-coding levels in mammals.

Authors:  Anabella P Trigila; Francisco Pisciottano; Lucía F Franchini
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Electrical Signal Modeling in Cochlear Implants. Study of Temperature and Humidity Effects.

Authors:  Maria-Alexandra Paun; Vladimir-Alexandru Paun; Viorel-Puiu Paun
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.891

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.