Literature DB >> 27761740

Aftereffects of Intense Low-Frequency Sound on Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions: Effect of Frequency and Level.

Lena Jeanson1, Lutz Wiegrebe1, Robert Gürkov2,3, Eike Krause2,3, Markus Drexl4,5.   

Abstract

The presentation of intense, low-frequency (LF) sound to the human ear can cause very slow, sinusoidal oscillations of cochlear sensitivity after LF sound offset, coined the "Bounce" phenomenon. Changes in level and frequency of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) are a sensitive measure of the Bounce. Here, we investigated the effect of LF sound level and frequency on the Bounce. Specifically, the level of SOAEs was tracked for minutes before and after a 90-s LF sound exposure. Trials were carried out with several LF sound levels (93 to 108 dB SPL corresponding to 47 to 75 phons at a fixed frequency of 30 Hz) and different LF sound frequencies (30, 60, 120, 240 and 480 Hz at a fixed loudness level of 80 phons). At an LF sound frequency of 30 Hz, a minimal sound level of 102 dB SPL (64 phons) was sufficient to elicit a significant Bounce. In some subjects, however, 93 dB SPL (47 phons), the lowest level used, was sufficient to elicit the Bounce phenomenon and actual thresholds could have been even lower. Measurements with different LF sound frequencies showed a mild reduction of the Bounce phenomenon with increasing LF sound frequency. This indicates that the strength of the Bounce not only is a simple function of the spectral separation between SOAE and LF sound frequency but also depends on absolute LF sound frequency, possibly related to the magnitude of the AC component of the outer hair cell receptor potential.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bounce phenomenon; cochlea; low-frequency sound; outer hair cells

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27761740      PMCID: PMC5243261          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0590-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  21 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency biasing on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: frequency modulation.

Authors:  Lin Bian
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Sources and effects of low-frequency noise.

Authors:  B Berglund; P Hassmén; R F Job
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Low-frequency noise from large wind turbines.

Authors:  Henrik Møller; Christian Sejer Pedersen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Ion flow in cochlear hair cells and the regulation of hearing sensitivity.

Authors:  Robert Patuzzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  A new method of calculating auditory excitation patterns and loudness for steady sounds.

Authors:  Zhangli Chen; Guangshu Hu; Brian R Glasberg; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Effects of external stimuli on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  L R Frick; M L Matthies
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The effect of static ear canal pressure on human spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: spectral width as a measure of the intra-cochlear oscillation amplitude.

Authors:  Pim van Dijk; Bert Maat; Emile de Kleine
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-02

8.  Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Manley; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  The effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-02

10.  Multiple indices of the 'bounce' phenomenon obtained from the same human ears.

Authors:  M Drexl; M Uberfuhr; T D Weddell; A N Lukashkin; L Wiegrebe; E Krause; R Gürkov
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-20
View more
  2 in total

1.  The Auditory Nerve Overlapped Waveform (ANOW) Detects Small Endolymphatic Manipulations That May Go Undetected by Conventional Measurements.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Choongheon Lee; Farah Dubaybo; Kaitlyn A Wenrich; Uzma S Wilson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 2.  A Review of the Possible Perceptual and Physiological Effects of Wind Turbine Noise.

Authors:  Simon Carlile; John L Davy; David Hillman; Kym Burgemeister
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.