Literature DB >> 14680660

Current challenges in clinimetrics.

Henrica C W de Vet1, Caroline B Terwee, Lex M Bouter.   

Abstract

Clinimetrics is a methodologic discipline that focuses on the quality of clinical measurements, for example, diagnostic characteristics and disease outcomes. Different clinimetric properties, such as reproducibility and responsiveness, are important in both the development and the evaluation of measurement instruments. This article presents a number of the current challenges in clinimetrics: there is much confusion with regard to terminology, clinimetric properties are population and situation-dependent, and the abundance of different measurement instruments in specific fields hampers the comparison of study results. Further challenges lie in the improvement of the quality of both the measurement instruments and the performance of the actual measurements, and the assessment of the suitability for use in clinical practice. From the perspective of evidence-based medicine, it is essential to have measurement instruments that make it possible to detect clinically relevant improvements that are due to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. Close collaboration between clinicians, statisticians, epidemiologists, and psychologists is necessary to guarantee healthy future developments in clinimetrics, serving the needs of both clinical research and clinical practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14680660     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  53 in total

1.  Burn wound depth assessment--is laser Doppler imaging the best measurement tool available?

Authors:  Anirban Mandal
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Adherence to the medical regimen during the first two years after lung transplantation.

Authors:  Mary Amanda Dew; Andrea F Dimartini; Annette De Vito Dabbs; Rachelle Zomak; Sabina De Geest; Fabienne Dobbels; Larissa Myaskovsky; Galen E Switzer; Mark Unruh; Jennifer L Steel; Robert L Kormos; Kenneth R McCurry
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Assessing pain and pain-related fear in acute low back pain: what is the smallest detectable change?

Authors:  Raymond W J G Ostelo; Ilse J C M Swinkels-Meewisse; Dirk L Knol; Johan W S Vlaeyen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2007

4.  Outcome instruments: rationale for their use.

Authors:  Rudolf W Poolman; Marc F Swiontkowski; Jeremy C T Fairbank; Emil H Schemitsch; Sheila Sprague; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Reflective, causal, and composite indicators of quality of life: A conceptual or an empirical distinction?

Authors:  Daniel S J Costa
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations.

Authors:  Henrik Hein Lauridsen; Jan Hartvigsen; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Niels Grunnet-Nilsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Evaluation of the clinimetrics of transcutaneous oxygen measurement and its application in wound care.

Authors:  Wai Lam Yip
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.315

8.  The Turkish version of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity.

Authors:  Ebru Kaya Mutlu; Derya Celik; Önder Kiliçoglu; Arzu Razak Ozdincler; Katarina Nilsson-Helander
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Clinimetric quality of the fire fighting simulation test as part of the Dutch fire fighters Workers' Health Surveillance.

Authors:  Marie-Christine J Plat; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Judith K Sluiter
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  A multivariate hierarchical Bayesian approach to measuring agreement in repeated measurement method comparison studies.

Authors:  Philip J Schluter
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.