| Literature DB >> 27136516 |
Anika Kuczmannová1, Andrea Balažová2, Eva Račanská3, Miroslava Kameníková4, Silvia Fialová5, Jaroslav Majerník6, Milan Nagy7, Peter Gál8,9,10, Pavel Mučaji11.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is frequently diagnosed at a time when patients already suffer from several cardiovascular complications. Our previously published data (Molecules 201520 (11): 20538-50) on the anti-oxidative properties of Agrimonia eupatoria L. (AE) and Cynara cardunculus L. (CC) prompted us to extend the available evidence on their possible protective activities on selected DM-related parameters in a streptozotocin-induced DM rat model and in a series of in vitro experiments. Male rats were divided into four groups: control group, untreated diabetic group, AE and CC treated diabetic groups. During a five-week period, changes in blood glucose and body weight were monitored. Then, rats were sacrificed and subjected to the assessment of changes in the reactivity of aortas and measurement of butyrylcholinesterase activity. To complete the panel of experiments, α-glucosidase activity was assessed in vitro. Our results demonstrate that both tested extracts exert similar anti-diabetic activities. However, better anti-oxidant activity of the A. eupatoria extract indicates its higher clinical potential in the prevention and/or adjuvant therapy of developing cardiovascular complications related to DM and diseases associated with oxidative stress.Entities:
Keywords: agrimony; artichoke; diabetes mellitus; phytotherapy; streptozotocin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27136516 PMCID: PMC6273028 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21050564
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Inhibition of α-glucosidase by A. eupatoria (IC50 = 46.31 ± 8.76 μg/mL) and C. cardunculus (IC50 not achieved) water extracts. Data are shown as mean ± SD and were compared using the one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test.
Figure 2Inhibition of AGE (advanced glycation end-products) formation by A. eupatoria and C. cardunculus water extracts in the BSA-GLC (bovine serum albumin-glucose) model. Data are shown as mean ± SD and were compared using the one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test.
Figure 3Effect of A. eupatoria and C. cardunculus water extracts on plasma glucose levels (a) and body weight in rats (c). Statistical comparison of the glucose levels (b) and body weight (d) between individual groups (CI—95% confidential interval, C—control group, UD—untreated diabetic group, AED—A. eupatoria treated diabetic group, CCD—C. cardunculus treated diabetic group). Data are shown as mean ± SD and were compared using the two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test.
Figure 4(a) Effect of A. eupatoria and C. cardunculus on specific activity of BuChE in rat livers; (b) Statistical comparison of BuChE activity between individual groups (C—control group, UD—untreated diabetic group, AED—A. eupatoria treated diabetic group, CCD—C. cardunculus treated diabetic group; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01). Data are shown as mean ± SD and were compared using the one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. Differences in the BuChE activity were statistically significant between all groups except AED vs. CCD.
Figure 5(a) Changes in reactibility of a phenylephrine pre-contracted rat’s aorta on acetylcholine (10−6 mol/L) after long-treated A. eupatoria and/or C. cardunculus; (b) Statistical comparison of aortal relaxation between individual groups. (C—control group, UD—untreated diabetic group, AED—A. eupatoria treated diabetic group, CCD—C. cardunculus treated diabetic group; ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05). Data are shown as mean ± SD and were compared using the one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. Difference in aorta relaxations were statistically significant only between selected groups: UD vs. AED and AED vs. CCD.