Literature DB >> 23395580

A systematic review of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity and its Portsmouth modification as predictors of post-operative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.

Haolu Wang1, Tao Chen, Hui Wang, Yanyan Song, Xinxing Li, Jian Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM) model and its Portsmouth modification (P-POSSUM) are used extensively to predict postoperative mortality and morbidity in general surgery. The aim of this study was to undertake the first systematic review of the predictive value of these models in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.
METHODS: Eligible articles were identified by searches of electronic databases for those published from 1991 to 2012. Two independent reviewers assessed each study against inclusion and exclusion criteria. All data were specific to pancreatic surgery. Predictive value of morbidity and mortality were assessed by calculating observed/expected ratios.
RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the final review. The morbidity analysis included 8 studies (1,734 patients) of POSSUM with a weighted observed/expected ratio of .85. The mortality analysis included 5 studies (936 patients) of POSSUM and 4 studies (716 patients) of P-POSSUM. Weighted observed/expected ratios for mortality were .35 for POSSUM and 1.39 for P-POSSUM.
CONCLUSIONS: POSSUM overpredicted postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. Both POSSUM and P-POSSUM failed to offer significant predictive value for mortality in pancreatic surgery, and more data collection in large populations undergoing pancreatic surgery are needed.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23395580     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  16 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthetic perioperative management of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Lesley De Pietri; Roberto Montalti; Bruno Begliomini
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Predicting morbidity of liver resection.

Authors:  Sudharsan Madhavan; Vishal G Shelat; Su-Lin Soong; Winston W L Woon; Terence Huey; Yiong H Chan; Sameer P Junnarkar
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Cyst Fluid Biosignature to Predict Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas with High Malignant Potential.

Authors:  Ajay V Maker; Vincent Hu; Shrihari S Kadkol; Lenny Hong; William Brugge; Jordan Winter; Charles J Yeo; Thilo Hackert; Markus Büchler; Rita T Lawlor; Roberto Salvia; Aldo Scarpa; Claudio Bassi; Stefan Green
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 4.  Can we better predict the biologic behavior of incidental IPMN? A comprehensive analysis of molecular diagnostics and biomarkers in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Kiara A Tulla; Ajay V Maker
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Scoring Systems for Outcome Prediction of Patients with Perforation Peritonitis.

Authors:  Murugappan Nachiappan; Manjusha Madhusudhan Litake
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

6.  Outcomes of nonresected main-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Mathieu Daudé; Fabrice Muscari; Camille Buscail; Nicolas Carrère; Philippe Otal; Janick Selves; Louis Buscail; Barbara Bournet
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  "Total arterial devascularization first" technique for resection of pancreatic head cancer during pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Feng Peng; Min Wang; Feng Zhu; Rui Tian; Cheng-Jian Shi; Meng Xu; Xin Wang; Ming Shen; Jun Hu; Shu-You Peng; Ren-Yi Qin
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-20

8.  Assessing surgical quality: comparison of general and procedure-specific morbidity estimation models for the risk adjustment of pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes.

Authors:  C Ansorge; P Lindström; L Strömmer; J Blomberg; L Lundell; A Andrén-Sandberg; M Del Chiaro; R Segersvärd
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration plus KRAS and GNAS mutation in malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.

Authors:  Barbara Bournet; Alix Vignolle-Vidoni; David Grand; Céline Roques; Florence Breibach; Jérome Cros; Fabrice Muscari; Nicolas Carrère; Janick Selves; Pierre Cordelier; Louis Buscail
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-11-10

10.  Evaluation of the POSSUM, P-POSSUM and E-PASS scores in the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Haolu Wang; Tao Chen; Xiaowen Liang; Yanyan Song; Jian Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.