Literature DB >> 18785067

Risk factors in patients surgically treated for peptic ulcer perforation.

Morten Hylander Møller1, Kamran Shah, Jørgen Bendix, Anders Gadegaard Jensen, Erik Zimmermann-Nielsen, Sven Adamsen, Ann Merete Møller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The overall mortality for patients undergoing surgery for perforated peptic ulcer has increased despite improvements in perioperative monitoring and treatment. The objective of this study was to identify and describe perioperative risk factors in order to identify ways of optimizing the treatment and to improve the outcome of patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-eight patients undergoing emergency surgery in four university hospitals in Denmark were included in the study. Information regarding the pre-, intra- and postoperative phases were recorded retrospectively from medical records. Data were analysed using multiple logistic regression analysis. The primary end-point was 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 27%. The following variables were independently associated with death within 30 days of surgery: ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) class, age, shock upon admission, preoperative metabolic acidosis, elevated concentration of creatinine upon admission, subnormal concentration of albumin upon admission and insufficient postoperative nutrition.
CONCLUSIONS: Thus, preoperative metabolic acidosis, renal insufficiency upon admission and insufficient postoperative nutrition have been added to the list of independent risk factors for death within 30 days of surgery in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. Finding that shock upon admission, reduced albumin blood levels upon admission, renal insufficiency upon admission and preoperative metabolic acidosis are independently related to 30-day mortality could indicate that patients with peptic ulcer perforation are septic upon admission, and thus might benefit from a perioperative care protocol with early source control and early goal-directed therapy according to The Surviving Sepsis Campaign. This hypothesis should be addressed in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18785067     DOI: 10.1080/00365520802401261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  12 in total

Review 1.  Emergency ulcer surgery.

Authors:  Constance W Lee; George A Sarosi
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Diagnostic study and meta-analysis of C-reactive protein as a predictor of postoperative inflammatory complications after gastroesophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Rene Warschkow; Ignazio Tarantino; Kristjan Ukegjini; Ulrich Beutner; Sascha A Müller; Bruno M Schmied; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Management of the difficult duodenal stump in penetrating duodenal ulcer disease: a comparative analysis of duodenojejunostomy with "classical" stump closure (Nissen-Bsteh).

Authors:  Yogesh K Vashist; Emre F Yekebas; Florian Gebauer; Michael Tachezy; Kai Bachmann; Alexandra König; Asad Kutup; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Scoring Systems for Outcome Prediction of Patients with Perforation Peritonitis.

Authors:  Murugappan Nachiappan; Manjusha Madhusudhan Litake
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

5.  Validation of prognostic scoring systems for predicting 30-day mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Shaili Patel; Devanshu Kalra; Samir Kacheriwala; Mihir Shah; Dipesh Duttaroy
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-12-16

6.  Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Tom B Glomsaker; Andreas von Meer; Kjetil Søreide; Jon Arne Søreide
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Preoperative predictors of mortality in adult patients with perforation peritonitis.

Authors:  Ranju Singh; Nishant Kumar; Abhijit Bhattacharya; Homay Vajifdar
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-07

8.  Diagnostic indicators for peptic ulcer perforation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand.

Authors:  Chutikarn Suriya; Nongyao Kasatpibal; Wipada Kunaviktikul; Toranee Kayee
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-09

Review 9.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Anesthetic management for patients with perforation peritonitis.

Authors:  Kiran Sharma; Mritunjay Kumar; Upma Bhatia Batra
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.