Literature DB >> 20352368

The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Galinos Barmparas1, Bernardino C Branco, Beat Schnüriger, Lydia Lam, Kenji Inaba, Demetrios Demetriades.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this review was to assess the incidence and risk factors for adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) following laparotomy.
METHODS: The PubMed database was systematically reviewed to identify studies in the English literature delineating the incidence of adhesive SBO and reporting risk factors for the development of this morbidity.
RESULTS: A total of 446,331 abdominal operations were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. The overall incidence of SBO was 4.6%. The risk of SBO was highly influenced by the type of procedure, with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis being associated with the highest incidence of SBO (1,018 out of 5,268 cases or 19.3%), followed by open colectomy (11,491 out of 121,085 cases or 9.5%). Gynecological procedures were associated with an overall incidence of 11.1% (4,297 out of 38,751 cases) and ranged from 23.9% in open adnexal surgery, to 0.1% after cesarean section. The technique of the procedure (open vs. laparoscopic) also played a major role in the development of adhesive SBO. The incidence was 7.1% in open cholecystectomies vs. 0.2% in laparoscopic; 15.6% in open total abdominal hysterectomies vs. 0.0% in laparoscopic; and 23.9% in open adnexal operations vs. 0.0% in laparoscopic. There was no difference in SBO following laparoscopic or open appendectomies (1.4% vs. 1.3%). Separate closure of the peritoneum, spillage and retention of gallstones during cholecystectomy, and the use of starched gloves all increase the risk for adhesion formation. There is not enough evidence regarding the role of age, gender, and presence of cancer in adhesion formation.
CONCLUSION: Adhesion-related morbidity comprises a significant burden on healthcare resources and prevention is of major importance, especially in high-risk patients. Preventive techniques and special barriers should be considered in high-risk cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20352368     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1189-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  89 in total

1.  Laparoscopy not recommended for routine appendectomy in men: results of a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  D Mutter; M Vix; A Bui; S Evrard; V Tassetti; J F Breton; J Marescaux
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  James M Becker; Arthur F Stucchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Complications associated with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  K McMullen; T C Hicks; J E Ray; J B Gathright; A E Timmcke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Longterm complications of hand-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  Toyooki Sonoda; Sushil Pandey; Koiana Trencheva; Sang Lee; Jeffrey Milsom
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Surgical complications in 123 consecutive pancreas transplant recipients: comparison of bladder and enteric drainage.

Authors:  A Sugitani; H A Gritsch; R Shapiro; C A Bonham; M F Egidi; R J Corry
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Unnecessary laparotomies for trauma: a prospective study of morbidity.

Authors:  B M Renz; D V Feliciano
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1995-03

7.  The SCAR-3 study: 5-year adhesion-related readmission risk following lower abdominal surgical procedures.

Authors:  M C Parker; M S Wilson; D Menzies; G Sunderland; D N Clark; A D Knight; A M Crowe
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Effects of visceral peritoneal closure on scar formation at cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Antonio Malvasi; Andrea Tinelli; Dan Farine; Siavash Rahimi; Carlo Cavallotti; Daniele Vergara; Roberta Martignago; Michael Stark
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.561

9.  The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients.

Authors:  T Oresland; S Fasth; S Nordgren; L Hultén
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane (Seprafilm) reduced early postoperative intestinal obstruction after lower abdominal surgery for colorectal cancer: the preliminary report.

Authors:  Chi-Min Park; Woo Yong Lee; Yong Beom Cho; Hae Ran Yun; Won-Suk Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.571

View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions.

Authors:  Willy Arung; Michel Meurisse; Olivier Detry
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Clinical Characteristics of Bowel Obstruction in Southern Iran; Results of a Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Majid Akrami; Ali Ghaeini Hesarooeih; Maryam Barfei; Vahid Zangouri; Zahra Alborzi
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2015-01

Review 3.  Postoperative adhesion development following cesarean and open intra-abdominal gynecological operations: a review.

Authors:  Awoniyi O Awonuga; Nicole M Fletcher; Ghassan M Saed; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Early postoperative small bowel obstruction: open vs laparoscopic.

Authors:  Naeem Goussous; Kevin M Kemp; Michael P Bannon; Michael L Kendrick; Boris Srvantstyan; Mohammad A Khasawneh; Martin D Zielinski
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  GI Surgical Emergencies: Scope and Burden of Disease.

Authors:  Matthew C Hernandez; Firas Madbak; Katherine Parikh; Marie Crandall
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of small bowel obstruction: an analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Ann Nordin; Jacob Freedman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Advances in the Pathogenesis of Adhesion Development: The Role of Oxidative Stress.

Authors:  Awoniyi O Awonuga; Jimmy Belotte; Suleiman Abuanzeh; Nicole M Fletcher; Michael P Diamond; Ghassan M Saed
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.060

8.  Decreased risk of surgery for small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery compared with open surgery: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Kristian Kiim Jensen; Peter Andersen; Rune Erichsen; Thomas Scheike; Lene Hjerrild Iversen; Peter-Martin Krarup
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Impact of Operative Management on Recurrence of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: A Longitudinal Analysis of a Statewide Database.

Authors:  Andrew J Medvecz; Bradley M Dennis; Li Wang; Christopher J Lindsell; Oscar D Guillamondegui
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Minimally invasive technique leads to decreased morbidity and mortality in small bowel resections compared to an open technique: an ACS-NSQIP identified target for improvement.

Authors:  Shaun C Daly; Andrew M Popoff; Louis Fogg; Amanda B Francescatti; Jonathan A Myers; Keith W Millikan; Daniel J Deziel; Minh B Luu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.