Literature DB >> 21667207

Bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer: results of 5 years of follow-up in a randomized trial.

Johnna Schölin1, Mark Buunen, Wim Hop, Jaap Bonjer, Bo Anderberg, Miguel Cuesta, Salvadora Delgado, Ainitze Ibarzabal, Marie-Louise Ivarsson, Martin Janson, Antonio Lacy, Johan Lange, Lars Påhlman, Stefan Skullman, Eva Haglind.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative bowel obstruction caused by intra-abdominal adhesions occurs after all types of abdominal surgery. It has been suggested that the laparoscopic technique should reduce the risk for adhesion formation and thus for postoperative bowel obstruction. This study was designed to compare the incidence of bowel obstruction in a randomized trial where laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer was compared.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed, collecting data of episodes of bowel obstruction with or without surgery. Only episodes treated in the hospital where the index surgery took place were included. Data for 786 patients were collected for the 5-year period after cancer surgery.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics for the evaluated laparoscopic (n = 383) and open (n = 403) groups were comparable. The cumulative obstruction percentages at 5 years for the open and laparoscopic groups were 6.5 and 5.1% respectively and did not significantly differ from each other. Tumor stage seemed to influence the risk for bowel obstruction: 2.8% in stage I, 6.6% in stage II, and 7% in stage III, but the differences were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis does not support the hypothesis that laparoscopy leads to fewer episodes of bowel obstruction compared with open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21667207     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1782-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  27 in total

1.  Risk factors of mortality after surgical treatment of intestinal obstruction in patients having prior laparotomy for non-malignancy.

Authors:  Nan-Hua Chou; King-Tong Mok; Being-Whey Wang; Hong-Tai Chang; Ping-I Hsu
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.743

2.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Partial small bowel obstruction and ileus following gynecologic laparoscopy.

Authors:  Magdy P Milad; Julian C Escobar; William Sanders
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Impact of hospital case volume on short-term outcome after laparoscopic operation for colonic cancer.

Authors:  E Kuhry; H J Bonjer; E Haglind; W C J Hop; R Veldkamp; M A Cuesta; J Jeekel; L Påhlman; M Morino; A Lacy; S Delgado
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

6.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Adhesions and colorectal surgery - call for action.

Authors:  M C Parker; M S Wilson; H van Goor; B J Moran; J Jeekel; J-J Duron; D Menzies; S D Wexner; H Ellis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Low incidence of adhesion-related bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Danny Rosin; Oded Zmora; Aviad Hoffman; Marat Khaikin; Barak Bar Zakai; Yaron Munz; Moshe Shabtai; Amram Ayalon
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.878

View more
  15 in total

1.  Clinical Treatment and Analysis of Laparoscopic Enterolysis Surgery.

Authors:  Bao-Yin Wu; Chao Gu; Xiu-Yun Yan; Hai-Yang Yu; Zhen You; Hao Wang; Li-Chao Wen; Ji-Zong Ren; Yu-Tie Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Significant reduction in the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after laparoscopic compared to open segmental colorectal resection.

Authors:  Daniel D Klaristenfeld; Elisabeth C McLemore; Bonnie H Li; Mohammad A Abbass; Maher A Abbas
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Postoperative Abdominal Adhesions: Clinical Significance and Advances in Prevention and Management.

Authors:  Demetrios Moris; Jeffery Chakedis; Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Ana Wilson; Mairead Marion Hennessy; Antonios Athanasiou; Eliza W Beal; Chrysoula Argyrou; Evangelos Felekouras; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Ten-year outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Salvatore Amodeo; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Marco Braga
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Risk of late-onset adhesions and incisional hernia repairs after surgery.

Authors:  Rodney P Bensley; Marc L Schermerhorn; Rob Hurks; Teviah Sachs; Christopher A Boyd; A James O'Malley; Philip Cotterill; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Incidence of adhesive small bowel obstruction after gastrectomy for gastric cancer and its risk factors: a long-term retrospective cohort study from a high-volume institution in China.

Authors:  Tao Pan; Danil Galiullin; Xiao-Long Chen; Wei-Han Zhang; Kun Yang; Kai Liu; Lin-Yong Zhao; Xin-Zu Chen; Jian-Kun Hu
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-02-06

Review 7.  Peritoneal adhesions after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Valerio Mais
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Risk of adhesive obstruction after colorectal surgery: the benefits of the minimally invasive approach may extend well beyond the perioperative period.

Authors:  A Reshef; T L Hull; R P Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Decreased risk of surgery for small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery compared with open surgery: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Kristian Kiim Jensen; Peter Andersen; Rune Erichsen; Thomas Scheike; Lene Hjerrild Iversen; Peter-Martin Krarup
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Small bowel obstruction and incisional hernia after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of comparative trials.

Authors:  Nicolò Pecorelli; Massimiliano Greco; Salvatore Amodeo; Marco Braga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.