| Literature DB >> 27127779 |
Anoma Chandrasekara1, Thamilini Josheph Kumar1.
Abstract
Starchy roots and tuber crops play a pivotal role in the human diet. There are number of roots and tubers which make an extensive biodiversity even within the same geographical location. Thus, they add variety to the diet in addition to offering numerous desirable nutritional and health benefits such as antioxidative, hypoglycemic, hypocholesterolemic, antimicrobial, and immunomodulatory activities. A number of bioactive constituents such as phenolic compounds, saponins, bioactive proteins, glycoalkaloids, and phytic acids are responsible for the observed effects. Many starchy tuber crops, except the common potatoes, sweet potatoes, and cassava, are not yet fully explored for their nutritional and health benefits. In Asian countries, some edible tubers are also used as traditional medicinal. A variety of foods can be prepared using tubers and they may also be used in industrial applications. Processing may affect the bioactivities of constituent compounds. Tubers have an immense potential as functional foods and nutraceutical ingredients to be explored in disease risk reduction and wellness.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27127779 PMCID: PMC4834168 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3631647
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
Nutritional composition of selected tuber crops.
| Nutrients (per 100 g) | Potatoes | Sweet potatoes, raw | Cassava, raw | Yam, raw | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White flesh and skin, raw | Red flesh and skin, raw | ||||
| Proximate composition | |||||
| Energy (kcal) | 69.0 | 70 | 86.0 | 160.0 | 118.0 |
| Protein (g) | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Total lipid (fat) (g) | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Carbohydrate, by difference (g) | 15.7 | 15.9 | 20.1 | 38.1 | 27.9 |
| Fibre, total dietary (g) | 2.4 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 4.1 |
| Sugars, total (g)g | 1.2 | 1.3 | 4.2 | 1.7 | 0.5 |
| Minerals | |||||
| Calcium, Ca (mg) | 9 | 10 | 30 | 16 | 17 |
| Magnesium, Mg (mg) | 21 | 22 | 25 | 21 | 21 |
| Potassium, K (mg) | 407 | 455 | 337 | 271 | 816 |
| Phosphorus, P (mg) | 62 | 61 | 47 | 27 | 55 |
| Sodium, Na (mg)m | 16 | 18 | 55 | 14 | 9 |
| Vitamins | |||||
| Total ascorbic acid (mg) | 19.70 | 8.60 | 2.40 | 20.60 | 17.10 |
| Thiamin (mg) | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.11 |
| Riboflavin (mg) | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| Niacin (mg) | 1.07 | 1.15 | 0.56 | 0.85 | 0.55 |
| Vitamin B-6 (mg) | 0.203 | 0.170 | 0.209 | 0.088 | 0.293 |
| Folate ( | 18 | 18 | 11 | 27 | 23 |
| Vitamin E (mg) | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.19 | 0.35 |
| Vitamin K ( | 1.6 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.3 |
| Vitamin A (IU)IU | 8 | 7 | 14187 | 13 | 138 |
Source: USDA [105].
Different types of tuber crops commonly consumed in world.
| Botanical name | Family | Common name | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Potatoes |
| Solanaceae | |
|
| |||
| Country potato |
| Lamiaceae (mint family) | Innala, ratala (Sri Lanka) |
|
| |||
| Cannas |
| Cannaceae | Buthsarana (Sri Lanka) |
|
| |||
|
| Marantaceae | Arrow root | |
|
| |||
| Taro |
| Araceae | Kiriala (Sri Lanka) |
|
| |||
| Yam |
| Dioscoreaceae | Purple yam; greater yam |
|
| |||
| Sweet potatoes |
| Convolvulaceae | Camote; batata |
|
| |||
| Cassava |
| Euphorbiaceae | Yuxco; mogo; manioc |
|
| |||
| Elephant foot yam |
| Araceae | White pot giant arum; stink lily |
Percentage of 2,2-diphenyl 1-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, flavonoids, and phenolic content of selected tuber crops.
| % DPPH inhibition | Flavonoids | Total phenolics | |
|---|---|---|---|
| St. Vincent yam ( | 18.9 ± 0.56 | 390.65 ± 40.63 | 16.03 ± 0.79 |
| Water yam ( | 95.83 ± 0.21 | 410.52 ± 20.22 | 13.10 ± 1.03 |
| Coco yam ( | 12.59 ± 0.66 | 145.31 ± 5.61 | 9.39 ± 0.68 |
| Sweet potatoes ( | 28.01 ± 1.34 | 165.34 ± 5.81 | 4.37 ± 0.27 |
| Potatoes ( | 20.47 ± 1.38 | 85.21 ± 4.32 | 18.26 ± 1.35 |
| Yellow yam ( | 13.55 ± 0.52 | 150.67 ± 30.34 | 3.43 ± 0.19 |
Source: Dilworth et al. [49].
Content of phenolic compounds during various processing methods of purple yam (Dioscorea alata).
| Fresh yam | Blanched | Frozen | Vacuum frying | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total phenolic content (mg gallic acid equivalent/100 g) | 478 ± 11.62 | 306 ± 7.7 | 293 ± 8.93 | 204 ± 5.49 |
| Total anthocyanin content (mg/100 g) | 31.0 ± 2.35 | 12.6 ± 1.65 | 12.6 ± 1.54 | 7.92 ± 1.03 |
| Sinapic acid (mg/100 g) | 135 ± 5.27 | 93.1 ± 7.53 | 91.73 ± 5.71 | 55.5 ± 3.32 |
| Ferulic acid (mg/100 g) | 31.3 ± 1.08 | 15.94 ± 1.15 | 15.77 ± 1.05 | 9.48 ± 1.11 |
Source: Fang et al. [103].