Literature DB >> 27127228

Social conformity is due to biased stimulus processing: electrophysiological and diffusion analyses.

Markus Germar1, Thorsten Albrecht2, Andreas Voss3, Andreas Mojzisch4.   

Abstract

Hundreds of studies have found that humans' decisions are strongly influenced by the opinions of others, even when making simple perceptual decisions. In this study, we aimed to clarify whether this effect can be explained by social influence biasing (early) perceptual processes. We employed stimulus evoked potentials, lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) and a diffusion model analysis of reaction time data to uncover the neurocognitive processes underlying social conformity in perceptual decision-making. The diffusion model analysis showed that social conformity was due to a biased uptake of stimulus information and accompanied by more careful stimulus processing. As indicated by larger N1-amplitudes, social influence increased early attentional resources for stimulus identification and discrimination. Furthermore, LRP analyses revealed that stimulus processing was biased even in cases of non-conformity. In conclusion, our results suggest that the opinion of others can cause individuals to selectively process stimulus information supporting this opinion, thereby inducing social conformity. This effect is present even when individuals do not blindly follow the majority but rather carefully process stimulus information.
© The Author (2016). Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  : social conformity; diffusion model analysis; event-related potentials; lateralized readiness potentials; perceptual decision-making

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27127228      PMCID: PMC5015799          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  27 in total

1.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process.

Authors:  E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation.

Authors:  T P Jung; S Makeig; C Humphries; T W Lee; M J McKeown; V Iragui; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs.

Authors:  R Ulrich; J Miller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  The control of attention to faces.

Authors:  Markus Bindemann; A Mike Burton; Stephen R H Langton; Stefan R Schweinberger; Martin J Doherty
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Bias in the brain: a diffusion model analysis of prior probability and potential payoff.

Authors:  Martijn J Mulder; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers; Roger Ratcliff; Wouter Boekel; Birte U Forstmann
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  EEG reveals an early influence of social conformity on visual processing in group pressure situations.

Authors:  Sina Alexa Trautmann-Lengsfeld; Christoph Siegfried Herrmann
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 8.  Cells, circuits, and choices: social influences on perceptual decision making.

Authors:  Andreas Mojzisch; Kristine Krug
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python.

Authors:  Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Effect of social influence on effort-allocation for monetary rewards.

Authors:  Jodi M Gilman; Michael T Treadway; Max T Curran; Vanessa Calderon; A Eden Evins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Experimental validation of the diffusion model based on a slow response time paradigm.

Authors:  Veronika Lerche; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-12-09

Review 2.  Characterization of the Core Determinants of Social Influence From a Computational and Cognitive Perspective.

Authors:  Hyeji Lee; Dongil Chung
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 5.435

3.  Norm compliance affects perceptual decisions through modulation of a starting point bias.

Authors:  Ulf Toelch; Folco Panizza; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Developmental trajectory of social influence integration into perceptual decisions in children.

Authors:  Imogen Large; Elizabeth Pellicano; Andreas Mojzisch; Kristine Krug
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.