Literature DB >> 17997684

The control of attention to faces.

Markus Bindemann1, A Mike Burton, Stephen R H Langton, Stefan R Schweinberger, Martin J Doherty.   

Abstract

Humans attend to faces. This study examines the extent to which attention biases to faces are under top-down control. In a visual cueing paradigm, observers responded faster to a target probe appearing in the location of a face cue than of a competing object cue (Experiments 1a and 2a). This effect could be reversed when faces were negatively predictive of the likely target location, making it beneficial to attend to the object cues (Experiments 1b and 2b). It was easier still to strategically shift attention to predictive face cues (Experiment 2c), indicating that the endogenous allocation of attention was augmented here by an additional effect. However, faces merely delayed the voluntary deployment of attention to object cues, but they could not prevent it, even at short cue-target intervals. This finding suggests that attention biases for faces can be rapidly countered by an observer's endogenous control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17997684     DOI: 10.1167/7.10.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  32 in total

1.  Attentional processing of faces in ASD: a Dot-Probe study.

Authors:  David J Moore; Lisa Heavey; John Reidy
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2012-10

2.  Attentional capture and hold: the oculomotor correlates of the change detection advantage for faces.

Authors:  Matthew D Weaver; Johan Lauwereyns
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-05-11

3.  Attentional capture by spatiotemporally task-irrelevant faces: supportive evidence for Sato and Kawahara (2015).

Authors:  Atsunori Ariga; Katsuhiko Arihara
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-28

4.  Spatial attention affects the early processing of neutral versus fearful faces when they are task-irrelevant: a classifier study of the EEG C1 component.

Authors:  David Acunzo; Graham MacKenzie; Mark C W van Rossum
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces.

Authors:  Shiori Sato; Jun I Kawahara
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07-17

6.  The own-age bias in face memory is unrelated to differences in attention--evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Markus F Neumann; Albert End; Stefanie Luttmann; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Social conformity is due to biased stimulus processing: electrophysiological and diffusion analyses.

Authors:  Markus Germar; Thorsten Albrecht; Andreas Voss; Andreas Mojzisch
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Task-Irrelevant Visual Forms Facilitate Covert and Overt Spatial Selection.

Authors:  Amarender R Bogadhi; Antimo Buonocore; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Visual search efficiency is greater for human faces compared to animal faces.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Simpson; Haley L Husband; Krysten Yee; Alison Fullerton; Krisztina V Jakobsen
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2014

10.  Faces capture the visuospatial attention of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): evidence from a cueing experiment.

Authors:  Masaki Tomonaga; Tomoko Imura
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.