Literature DB >> 10731769

The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process.

E K Vogel1, S J Luck.   

Abstract

Many previous studies have demonstrated that the visual N1 component is larger for attended-location stimuli than for unattended-location stimuli. This difference is observed typically only for tasks involving a discrimination of the attended-location stimuli, suggesting that the N1 wave reflects a discrimination process that is applied to the attended location. The present study tested this hypothesis by examining the N1 component elicited by attended stimuli under conditions that either required or did not require the subject to perform a discrimination. Specifically, the N1 elicited by foveal stimuli during choice-reaction time (RT) tasks was compared with the N1 elicited by identical stimuli during simple-RT tasks. In three experiments, a larger posterior N1 was observed in choice-RT tasks than in simple-RT tasks, even when several potential confounds were eliminated (e.g., arousal and motor preparation). This N1 discrimination effect was observed even when no motor response was required and was present for both color- and form-based discriminations. Moreover, this discrimination effect was equally large for easy and difficult discriminations, arguing against a simple resource-based explanation of the present results. Instead, the results of this study are consistent with the hypothesis that the visual N1 component reflects the operation of a discrimination process within the focus of attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10731769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  229 in total

1.  Internal state of monkey primary visual cortex (V1) predicts figure-ground perception.

Authors:  Hans Supèr; Chris van der Togt; Henk Spekreijse; Victor A F Lamme
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  An electrophysiological comparison of visual categorization and recognition memory.

Authors:  Tim Curran; James W Tanaka; Daniel M Weiskopf
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Working memory templates are maintained as feature-specific perceptual codes.

Authors:  Kartik K Sreenivasan; Deepak Sambhara; Amishi P Jha
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Attentional and intentional cueing in a Simon task: an EEG-based approach.

Authors:  Edmund Wascher; M Wolber
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-05-15

5.  Bimodal speech: early suppressive visual effects in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Julien Besle; Alexandra Fort; Claude Delpuech; Marie-Hélène Giard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Atypical neural responses to phonological detail in children with developmental language impairments.

Authors:  Lisa M D Archibald; Marc F Joanisse
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 6.464

7.  Stroop matching task: role of feature selection and temporal modulation.

Authors:  Isabel A David; Eliane Volchan; Jaime Vila; Andreas Keil; Letícia de Oliveira; Aydamari J P Faria-Júnior; Pandelis Perakakis; Elisa C Dias; Izabela Mocaiber; Mirtes G Pereira; Walter Machado-Pinheiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Spatiotemporal mapping of sex differences during attentional processing.

Authors:  Andres H Neuhaus; Carolin Opgen-Rhein; Carsten Urbanek; Melanie Gross; Eric Hahn; Thi Minh Tam Ta; Simone Koehler; Michael Dettling
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL STUDY OF ATTENTION REGULATION DURING ILLUSORY FIGURE CATEGORIZATION TASK IN ADHD, AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER, AND TYPICAL CHILDREN.

Authors:  Estate M Sokhadze; Joshua M Baruth; Lonnie Sears; Guela E Sokhadze; Ayman S El-Baz; Emily Williams; Robert Klapheke; Manuel F Casanova
Journal:  J Neurother       Date:  2012-03-02

10.  Contextual task difficulty modulates stimulus discrimination: electrophysiological evidence for interaction between sensory and executive processes.

Authors:  John R Fedota; Craig G McDonald; Daniel M Roberts; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.