Literature DB >> 27123543

Robot-assisted Fallopian tube transection and anastomosis using the new REVO-I robotic surgical system: feasibility in a chronic porcine model.

Ali Abdel Raheem1,2, Irela Soto Troya2, Dae Keun Kim3, Se Hoon Kim4, Park Dong Won5, Park Sung Joon5, Gim Soo Hyun5, Koon Ho Rha6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of the new REVO-I robotic platform by performing Fallopian tube transection and anastomosis in live porcine models. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A prospective chronic animal study was carried out in four crossbred female pigs. The primary outcome was assessment of the pigs' 2-week survival. The secondary outcomes were measurements of intra-operative variables and the complications or difficulties arising when using the REVO-I.
RESULTS: Fallopian tube anastomosis was successfully performed in four porcine models. The mean (range) operating time was 66 (46-104 min), docking time 22.25 (14-53) min and console time 18 (13-20) min. The REVO-I robotic system functioned appropriately, with no technical problems or difficulties noted during the procedures. Both the surgeon and the bedside assistants reported ease of use and better performance with subsequent procedures. All pigs were alive 2 weeks after surgery, with no peri-operative complications related to the use of the robot.
CONCLUSIONS: This preclinical chronic porcine study showed that the REVO-I robotic surgical system is a feasible and safe robotic instrument that can be used by surgeons to perform skillful robotic procedures in porcine models. Our next objective will be to demonstrate its safety in humans.
© 2016 The Authors BJU International © 2016 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fallopian tubes; REVO-I; porcine model; robotic

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27123543     DOI: 10.1111/bju.13517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  9 in total

1.  Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study.

Authors:  Ichiro Uyama; Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Takahiro Kinoshita; Hirokazu Noshiro; Shuji Takiguchi; Kazuhisa Ehara; Kazutaka Obama; Shiro Kuwabara; Hiroshi Okabe; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Robotic surgery: new robots and finally some real competition!

Authors:  Pradeep P Rao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Surgical robotic systems: What we have now? A urological perspective.

Authors:  Ahmad Almujalhem; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-08-19

4.  Cholecystectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system from Korea: the first clinical study.

Authors:  Jin Hong Lim; Woo Jung Lee; Seung Ho Choi; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-09-16

5.  Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Aaron Varghese; Marisol Doglioli; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  Human and robot: an amity not a discord.

Authors:  Glen Denmer R Santok; Ali Abdel Raheem; Ki Don Chang; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-04

Review 7.  Novel robotic systems and future directions.

Authors:  Ki Don Chang; Ali Abdel Raheem; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

8.  The future of robotics.

Authors:  Hannah Warren; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-08-25

Review 9.  Robotic surgical systems in urology: What is currently available?

Authors:  Periklis Koukourikis; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.