Literature DB >> 31524659

Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery.

Aaron Varghese1, Marisol Doglioli, Amanda N Fader.   

Abstract

minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the standard approach to performance of several gynecologic procedures, including hysterectomy, gynecologic cancer staging procedures, myomectomy, pelvic organ prolapse repair, and select adnexal procedures. Robotic-assisted surgery, a computer-based MIS approach, has been adopted widely in the United States and several other countries. Robotics may offer technological and ergonomic benefits that overcome limitations associated with conventional laparoscopy; however, it is not clear that reported claims of superiority translate into improved gynecologic patient outcomes compared with other MIS approaches. This review critically appraises the evolving role, benefits, limitations, and controversies of robotic-assisted surgery utilization in benign and oncologic gynecology settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31524659      PMCID: PMC6944326          DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  80 in total

1.  Statistical evaluation of learning curve effects in surgical trials.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cook; Craig R Ramsay; Peter Fayers
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 2.  Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Abdulrahman K Sinno; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients.

Authors:  Peter C Lim; Elizabeth Kang; Do Hwan Park
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: long-term survival outcomes in a matched cohort study.

Authors:  J-H Nam; J-Y Park; D-Y Kim; J-H Kim; Y-M Kim; Y-T Kim
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.

Authors:  Arnold P Advincula; Xiao Xu; Suntrea Goudeau; Scott B Ransom
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy.

Authors:  Carrie E Bedient; Javier F Magrina; Brie N Noble; Rosanne M Kho
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Pregnancy outcomes following robot-assisted myomectomy.

Authors:  Michael C Pitter; Antonio R Gargiulo; Leo M Bonaventura; J Stefano Lehman; Serene S Srouji
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Surgery in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Amanda N Fader
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
View more
  7 in total

1.  Does the experience of the first assistant affect organ injuries in laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign diseases?

Authors:  Yoko Tsuzuki; Takumi Hirata; Shinya Tsuzuki; Shinichiro Wada; Akiko Tamakoshi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Abdominal Myomectomy for Large Myomas Sized over 10 cm or Weighing 250 g.

Authors:  Sa Ra Lee; Eun Sil Lee; Young Jae Lee; Shin Wha Lee; Jeong Yeol Park; Dae Yeon Kim; Sung Hoon Kim; Yong Man Kim; Dae Shik Suh; Young Tak Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  New Surgical Technique for Robotic Myomectomy: Continuous Locking Suture on Myoma (LSOM) Technique.

Authors:  Sa Ra Lee; Eun Sil Lee; Hye Lim Eum; Young-Jae Lee; Shin-Wha Lee; Jeong Yeol Park; Dae-Shik Suh; Dae-Yeon Kim; Sung Hoon Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Youssef Youssef; Huda Afaneh; Mostafa A Borahay
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

Review 5.  Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology.

Authors:  Gayatri R Bankar; Ajay Keoliya
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-15

6.  Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case-control study.

Authors:  So Hyun Ahn; Joo Hyun Park; Hye Rim Kim; SiHyun Cho; Myeongjee Lee; Seok Kyo Seo; Young Sik Choi; Byung Seok Lee
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy; comparison of early surgical outcomes

Authors:  Özgüç Takmaz; Mete Güngör
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2020-06-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.