Literature DB >> 27121580

Target size matters: target errors contribute to the generalization of implicit visuomotor learning.

Maayan Reichenthal1, Guy Avraham2, Amir Karniel2, Lior Shmuelof3.   

Abstract

The process of sensorimotor adaptation is considered to be driven by errors. While sensory prediction errors, defined as the difference between the planned and the actual movement of the cursor, drive implicit learning processes, target errors (e.g., the distance of the cursor from the target) are thought to drive explicit learning mechanisms. This distinction was mainly studied in the context of arm reaching tasks where the position and the size of the target were constant. We hypothesize that in a dynamic reaching environment, where subjects have to hit moving targets and the targets' dynamic characteristics affect task success, implicit processes will benefit from target errors as well. We examine the effect of target errors on learning of an unnoticed perturbation during unconstrained reaching movements. Subjects played a Pong game, in which they had to hit a moving ball by moving a paddle controlled by their hand. During the game, the movement of the paddle was gradually rotated with respect to the hand, reaching a final rotation of 25°. Subjects were assigned to one of two groups: The high-target error group played the Pong with a small ball, and the low-target error group played with a big ball. Before and after the Pong game, subjects performed open-loop reaching movements toward static targets with no visual feedback. While both groups adapted to the rotation, the postrotation reaching movements were directionally biased only in the small-ball group. This result provides evidence that implicit adaptation is sensitive to target errors.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pong; generalization; motor adaptation; reaching

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27121580      PMCID: PMC4969381          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00830.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Becoming aware of motor skill.

Authors:  D B. Willingham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a cognitive response to the sudden introduction of load?

Authors:  Nicole Malfait; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Cross talk in implicit assignment of error information during bimanual visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Shoko Kasuga; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Motor memory is encoded as a gain-field combination of intrinsic and extrinsic action representations.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Daniel Z Press; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Flexible cognitive strategies during motor learning.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Estimating the sources of motor errors for adaptation and generalization.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Konrad Kording
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  9 in total

1.  Estimating the implicit component of visuomotor rotation learning by constraining movement preparation time.

Authors:  Li-Ann Leow; Reece Gunn; Welber Marinovic; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Relative sensitivity of explicit reaiming and implicit motor adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah A Hutter; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Vowel generalization and its relation to adaptation during perturbations of auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Chelsea Pettibone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A rapid visuomotor response on the human upper limb is selectively influenced by implicit motor learning.

Authors:  Chao Gu; J Andrew Pruszynski; Paul L Gribble; Brian D Corneil
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The influence of task outcome on implicit motor learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Darius E Parvin; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Early stages of sensorimotor map acquisition: learning with free exploration, without active movement or global structure.

Authors:  F T van Vugt; D J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  State-Based Delay Representation and Its Transfer from a Game of Pong to Reaching and Tracking.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; Raz Leib; Assaf Pressman; Lucia S Simo; Amir Karniel; Lior Shmuelof; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-12-26

8.  Reexposure to a sensorimotor perturbation produces opposite effects on explicit and implicit learning processes.

Authors:  Guy Avraham; J Ryan Morehead; Hyosub E Kim; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 9.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Guy Avraham; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.137

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.