Literature DB >> 27112292

Shadow Enhancers Mediate Dynamic Shifts of Gap Gene Expression in the Drosophila Embryo.

Ezzat El-Sherif1, Michael Levine2.   

Abstract

Drosophila patterning genes often contain pairs of primary and shadow enhancers that possess overlapping activities [1-5]. It has been suggested that this regulatory "redundancy" helps ensure reliable activation of gene expression under stressful conditions such as increases in temperature [4, 5]. There is also evidence that shadow enhancers help produce sharp on/off boundaries of gene expression in response to small changes in the levels of regulatory factors, such as the maternal Bicoid gradient [6, 7]. Here, we use live-imaging methods to visualize the temporal dynamics of the gap genes Kruppel and knirps, which are essential for the patterning of the thorax and abdomen, respectively [8, 9]. Previous analyses of fixed embryos suggested anterior shifts of the Kruppel and knirps expression patterns [10]. Here, we use computational visualization methods to reveal the precise temporal dynamics of these shifts and further suggest that shadow enhancers are crucial for this process. We discuss potential mechanisms for enhancer dominance, whereby one enhancer represses the other to foster temporal dynamics.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27112292      PMCID: PMC4957242          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  26 in total

1.  The role of binding site cluster strength in Bicoid-dependent patterning in Drosophila.

Authors:  Amanda Ochoa-Espinosa; Gozde Yucel; Leah Kaplan; Adam Pare; Noel Pura; Adam Oberstein; Dmitri Papatsenko; Stephen Small
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Whole-genome ChIP-chip analysis of Dorsal, Twist, and Snail suggests integration of diverse patterning processes in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Julia Zeitlinger; Robert P Zinzen; Alexander Stark; Manolis Kellis; Hailan Zhang; Richard A Young; Michael Levine
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease.

Authors:  Denes Hnisz; Brian J Abraham; Tong Ihn Lee; Ashley Lau; Violaine Saint-André; Alla A Sigova; Heather A Hoke; Richard A Young
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Complex regulatory region mediating tailless expression in early embryonic patterning and brain development.

Authors:  K M Rudolph; G J Liaw; A Daniel; P Green; A J Courey; V Hartenstein; J A Lengyel
Journal:  Development       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila.

Authors:  S Gray; M Levine
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Mutually repressive interactions between the gap genes giant and Krüppel define middle body regions of the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  R Kraut; M Levine
Journal:  Development       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.868

7.  Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers.

Authors:  Nicolás Frankel; Gregory K Davis; Diego Vargas; Shu Wang; François Payre; David L Stern
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Caudal regulates the spatiotemporal dynamics of pair-rule waves in Tribolium.

Authors:  Ezzat El-Sherif; Xin Zhu; Jinping Fu; Susan J Brown
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Shadow Enhancers Are Pervasive Features of Developmental Regulatory Networks.

Authors:  Enrico Cannavò; Pierre Khoueiry; David A Garfield; Paul Geeleher; Thomas Zichner; E Hilary Gustafson; Lucia Ciglar; Jan O Korbel; Eileen E M Furlong
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Enhancer additivity and non-additivity are determined by enhancer strength in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Jacques P Bothma; Hernan G Garcia; Samuel Ng; Michael W Perry; Thomas Gregor; Michael Levine
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  32 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis reveals genotype- and domain- specific differences between mRNA and protein expression of segmentation genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Svetlana Surkova; Alena Sokolkova; Konstantin Kozlov; Sergey V Nuzhdin; Maria Samsonova
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 2.  Enhancer redundancy in development and disease.

Authors:  Evgeny Z Kvon; Zeba Wunderlich; Rachel Waymack; Mario Gad
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  The nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio directly regulates zygotic transcription in Drosophila through multiple modalities.

Authors:  Sahla Syed; Henry Wilky; João Raimundo; Bomyi Lim; Amanda A Amodeo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Temporal dynamics of pair-rule stripes in living Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Bomyi Lim; Takashi Fukaya; Tyler Heist; Michael Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Odd-paired controls frequency doubling in Drosophila segmentation by altering the pair-rule gene regulatory network.

Authors:  Erik Clark; Michael Akam
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Speed regulation of genetic cascades allows for evolvability in the body plan specification of insects.

Authors:  Xin Zhu; Heike Rudolf; Lucas Healey; Paul François; Susan J Brown; Martin Klingler; Ezzat El-Sherif
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Signal Integration by Shadow Enhancers and Enhancer Duplications Varies across the Drosophila Embryo.

Authors:  Clarissa Scholes; Kelly M Biette; Timothy T Harden; Angela H DePace
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 8.  Imaging transcriptional dynamics.

Authors:  Bomyi Lim
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 9.740

9.  Ciona Brachyury proximal and distal enhancers have different FGF dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Matthew J Harder; Julie Hix; Wendy M Reeves; Michael T Veeman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Shadow enhancers can suppress input transcription factor noise through distinct regulatory logic.

Authors:  Rachel Waymack; Alvaro Fletcher; German Enciso; Zeba Wunderlich
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.