Literature DB >> 30629954

Quantitative analysis reveals genotype- and domain- specific differences between mRNA and protein expression of segmentation genes in Drosophila.

Svetlana Surkova1, Alena Sokolkova2, Konstantin Kozlov2, Sergey V Nuzhdin3, Maria Samsonova4.   

Abstract

In many biological systems gene expression at mRNA and protein levels is not identical. Rigorous comparison of such differences on a spatio-temporal scale is still not feasible by high-throughput transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of early embryo development. Here, we characterize differences between mRNA and protein expression of Drosophila segmentation genes at the level of individual gene expression domains. We obtained quantitative imaging data on expression of gap genes gt and hb and pair-rule gene eve for Drosophila wild type embryos, Kr null mutants and Kr+/Kr- heterozygotes. To compare mRNA and protein expression we use several criteria including difference in amplitude and positions of expression domains, pattern shape and positional variability. For a number of gene expression domains we show examples where protein expression does not repeat mRNA expression even after a temporal delay. We calculated time delays between eve pattern formation at the level of mRNA and protein for wild type embryos, Kr mutants and Kr+/Kr- heterozygotes. We detect that in wild type embryos, the amplitudes of eve stripes 3 and 7 do not differ significantly at the level of mRNA, however, stripe 3 is higher than stripe 7 at the protein level. We further show that hb mRNA and protein expression in both anterior and posterior domains significantly differs at specific time points. The formation of hb PS4 stripe at the mRNA level proceeds five times faster than at the level of protein. With regard to spatial expression, we show that the offset between posterior gt mRNA and protein domains is much larger in Kr mutants than in wild type embryos and heterozygotes. Finally, we analyze differences in positional variability of eve stripe 7 expression in Kr mutants and Kr+/Kr- heterozygotes at the level of mRNA and protein. These results enable further perspectives to uncover mechanisms underlying discrepancies between mRNA and protein expression in early embryo.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confocal microscopy; Discrepancies between mRNA and protein levels; Drosophila embryo; Gene expression; Pattern formation; Positional information; Segmentation genes; mRNA and protein expression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30629954      PMCID: PMC6477536          DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Biol        ISSN: 0012-1606            Impact factor:   3.582


  50 in total

1.  Bicoid associates with the 5'-cap-bound complex of caudal mRNA and represses translation.

Authors:  Dierk Niessing; Stephen Blanke; Herbert Jäckle
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Drosophila blastoderm patterning.

Authors:  Johannes Jaeger; John Reinitz
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Early and late periodic patterns of even skipped expression are controlled by distinct regulatory elements that respond to different spatial cues.

Authors:  T Goto; P Macdonald; T Maniatis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-05-05       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  W Driever; C Nüsslein-Volhard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-01-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  RNA binding and translational suppression by bicoid.

Authors:  R Rivera-Pomar; D Niessing; U Schmidt-Ott; W J Gehring; H Jäckle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-22       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Simultaneous detection of RNA and protein by in situ hybridization and immunological staining.

Authors:  H Nagaso; T Murata; N Day; K K Yokoyama
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 7.  Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses.

Authors:  Christine Vogel; Edward M Marcotte
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Autoregulatory and gap gene response elements of the even-skipped promoter of Drosophila.

Authors:  K Harding; T Hoey; R Warrior; M Levine
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  A conserved developmental patterning network produces quantitatively different output in multiple species of Drosophila.

Authors:  Charless C Fowlkes; Kelly B Eckenrode; Meghan D Bragdon; Miriah Meyer; Zeba Wunderlich; Lisa Simirenko; Cris L Luengo Hendriks; Soile V E Keränen; Clara Henriquez; David W Knowles; Mark D Biggin; Michael B Eisen; Angela H DePace
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Combining protein and mRNA quantification to decipher transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Heng Xu; Leonardo A Sepúlveda; Lauren Figard; Anna Marie Sokac; Ido Golding
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  1 in total

1.  Inhibitor of RAGE and glucose‑induced inflammation in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: Effect and mechanism of action.

Authors:  Mengyi Jiang; Xuemei Wang; Pin Wang; Wei Peng; Bo Zhang; Ling Guo
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.952

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.