Literature DB >> 8598297

Short-range transcriptional repressors mediate both quenching and direct repression within complex loci in Drosophila.

S Gray1, M Levine.   

Abstract

The early Drosophila embryo provides a unique system for the analysis of transcriptional repression since a broad spectrum of repressors are distributed in spatially distinct patterns. Krüppel (Kr) and snail (sna), two zinc finger repressors, are essential for segmentation and for the establishment of the mesoderm/neuroectoderm boundary, respectively. Both repressors were examined in the context of synthetic gene complexes containing modular promoters and divergently transcribed reporter genes. These studies indicate that Kr and sna function as short-range repressors, which can mediate either quenching or direct repression of the transcription complex, depending on the location of repressor sites. When located within an upstream enhancer, the repressor locally quenches nearby activators and permits other enhancers to interact with the transcription complex (enhancer autonomy). In contrast, when bound to promoter-proximal regions the repressor functions in a dominant fashion and blocks multiple enhancers. Local quenching and dominant repression require close linkage (<100 bp) of the repressor with either upstream activators or the transcription complex. These studies establish short-range repression as a flexible form of gene regulation and suggest that the key distinction among repressors is their range of action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8598297     DOI: 10.1101/gad.10.6.700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  72 in total

1.  zfh-1, the Drosophila homologue of ZEB, is a transcriptional repressor that regulates somatic myogenesis.

Authors:  A A Postigo; E Ward; J B Skeath; D C Dean
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Independent repressor domains in ZEB regulate muscle and T-cell differentiation.

Authors:  A A Postigo; D C Dean
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Identification of a boundary domain adjacent to the potent human cytomegalovirus enhancer that represses transcription of the divergent UL127 promoter.

Authors:  A Angulo; D Kerry; H Huang; E M Borst; A Razinsky; J Wu; U Hobom; M Messerle; P Ghazal
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Binding of Ikaros to the lambda5 promoter silences transcription through a mechanism that does not require heterochromatin formation.

Authors:  P Sabbattini; M Lundgren; A Georgiou; C Chow ; G Warnes; N Dillon
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  ZEB represses transcription through interaction with the corepressor CtBP.

Authors:  A A Postigo; D C Dean
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  CtBP-dependent activities of the short-range Giant repressor in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Y Nibu; M S Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  An anteroposterior Dorsal gradient in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  A M Huang; J Rusch; M Levine
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  The gypsy insulator can function as a promoter-specific silencer in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  H N Cai; M Levine
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Coordinate enhancers share common organizational features in the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Albert Erives; Michael Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Transcriptional repression via antilooping in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Vivek S Chopra; Nikki Kong; Michael Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.