Literature DB >> 19805685

Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management.

Meagan Elizabeth Brennan1, Nehmat Houssami, Sarah Lord, Petra Macaskill, Les Irwig, J Michael Dixon, Ruth M L Warren, Stefano Ciatto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for staging women with breast cancer, including screening for occult contralateral cancer. This article is a review and meta-analysis of studies reporting contralateral MRI in women with newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer.
METHODS: We systematically reviewed the evidence on contralateral MRI, calculating pooled estimates for positive predictive value (PPV), true-positive:false-positive ratio (TP:FP), and incremental cancer detection rate (ICDR) over conventional imaging. Random effects logistic regression examined whether estimates were associated with study quality or clinical variables.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies reported contralateral malignancies detected only by MRI in 131 of 3,253 women. Summary estimates were as follows: MRI-detected suspicious findings (TP plus FP), 9.3% (95% CI, 5.8% to 14.7%); ICDR, 4.1% (95% CI, 2.7% to 6.0%), PPV, 47.9% (95% CI, 31.8% to 64.6%); TP:FP ratio, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.47 to 1.82). PPV was associated with the number of test positives and baseline imaging. Few studies included consecutive women, and few ascertained outcomes in all subjects. Where reported, 35.1% of MRI-detected cancers were ductal carcinoma in situ (mean size = 6.9 mm), 64.9% were invasive cancers (mean size = 9.3 mm), and the majority were stage pTis or pT1 and node negative. Effect on treatment was inconsistently reported, but many women underwent contralateral mastectomy.
CONCLUSION: MRI detects contralateral lesions in a substantial proportion of women, but does not reliably distinguish benign from malignant findings. Relatively high ICDR may be due to selection bias and/or overdetection. Women must be informed of the uncertain benefit and potential harm, including additional investigations and surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19805685     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  62 in total

1.  Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging for breast surgery planning.

Authors:  Sibel Ozkan Gurdal; Beyza Ozcinar; Munire Kayahan; Abdullah Igci; Mehtap Tunaci; Vahit Ozmen; Gulden Acunas; Ekrem Yavuz; Mustafa Kecer; Mahmut Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Update 2010 of the German AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early and Metastatic Breast Cancer - Chapter A: Surgery, Pathology and Prognostic Factors, Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy, Adjuvant Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Christoph Thomssena; Nadia Harbeckb
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Perioperative breast MRI is not associated with lower locoregional recurrence rates in DCIS patients treated with or without radiation.

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Cristina Olcese; Anne Eaton; Sujata Patil; Elizabeth Morris; Monica Morrow; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Extra-mammary findings in breast MRI.

Authors:  Pierluigi Rinaldi; M Costantini; P Belli; M Giuliani; E Bufi; R Fubelli; D Distefano; M Romani; L Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Mammoplasty for symmetry in breast reconstruction and histologic assessment.

Authors:  Apollinaire Gninlgninrin Horo; Olivier Acker; Etienne Roussel; Henri Marret; Gilles Body
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Update 2010 of the German AGO Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early and Metastatic Breast Cancer - Chapter B: Prevention, Early Detection, Lifestyle, Premalignant Lesions, DCIS, Recurrent and Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Christoph Thomssen; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of pathologic response in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment for operable breast cancer. Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium trial 017.

Authors:  Jennifer F De Los Santos; Alan Cantor; Keith D Amos; Andres Forero; Mehra Golshan; Janet K Horton; Clifford A Hudis; Nola M Hylton; Kandace McGuire; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ingrid M Meszoely; Rita Nanda; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Surgical attitudes toward preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging in women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  S D Mukherjee; N Hodgson; P J Lovrics; K Dhamanaskar; S Chambers; J Sussman
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  MRI-guided core needle biopsy of the breast: Radiology-pathology correlation and impact on clinical management.

Authors:  Amy J Lilly; Meredith Johnson; Cherie M Kuzmiak; David W Ollila; Siobhan M O'Connor; Johann D Hertel; Benjamin C Calhoun
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 2.090

10.  Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: consider annual follow-up.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Zheng Zhang; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.