Literature DB >> 9923945

Do women who undergo further investigation for breast screening suffer adverse psychological consequences? A multi-centre follow-up study comparing different breast screening result groups five months after their last breast screening appointment.

J Brett1, J Austoker, G Ong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1995-1996 about 53500 women aged 50-64 attending for routine breast screening were called back for further investigation after an initial mammogram. Even when women were found to be clear after further investigation, significant adverse psychological consequences (PCs) can remain one month later. This follow-up study investigates whether residual emotional effects persisted five months after women received a clear result.
METHODS: Women who had previously completed a questionnaire one month after their last breast screening appointment, at which they had a clear result, were invited to complete a further postal questionnaire four months later (five months after their last appointment). We compare women who received a clear result after assessment without fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), after assessment with FNAC, after a benign biopsy, and those who had been placed on early recall, with those who received a clear result after mammography (reference group).
RESULTS: The response rate was 76 per cent (215/284). All groups of women who went on for further investigation suffered significantly greater adverse psychological consequences (PCs) at five months than women who were given a clear result after mammography. Compared with 10 per cent (5/52) of women who received a clear result after a basic mammogram, adverse psychological consequences were experienced by 59 per cent (27/46, p<0.00001) of the women who were placed on six month early recall, 61 per cent (14/23, p<0.0001) of women who had benign surgical biopsy, 44 per cent (18/41, p<0.0001) of women who received a clear result after assessment (with FNAC), and 45 per cent (23/51, p<0.0001) of women who received a clear result after assessment (without FNAC). Whereas all groups who had gone on for further investigations had experienced a significant decrease in PCs between one month and five months, those who were placed on six month early recall showed no significant difference in PCs between these two time periods. Other factors relating to adverse experiences as a result of breast screening are reported.
CONCLUSION: Despite receiving a clear final result, women who undergo further investigation suffer significantly greater adverse psychological consequences five months after their last screening appointment than women who receive a clear result after mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9923945     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  41 in total

Review 1.  Evidence based case report: Advice about mammography for a young woman with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  A Lucassen; E Watson; D Eccles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-28

2.  Gaining informed consent for screening. Is difficult--but many misconceptions need to be undone.

Authors:  J Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

3.  Screening for breast and cervical cancer as a common cause for litigation. A false negative result may be one of an irreducible minimum of errors.

Authors:  R M Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-20

4.  Improving the time to diagnosis after an abnormal screening mammogram.

Authors:  I A Olivotto; M J Borugian; L Kan; S R Harris; E J Rousseau; S E Thorne; J A Vestrup; C J Wright; A J Coldman; T G Hislop
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

Review 5.  Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors:  Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Pros and cons of screening for occult Cushing syndrome.

Authors:  Antoine Tabarin; Paul Perez
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 43.330

7.  "What does this mean?" How Web-based consumer health information fails to support information seeking in the pursuit of informed consent for screening test decisions.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Burkell; D Grant Campbell
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2005-07

8.  Annual vs Biennial Screening: Diagnostic Accuracy Among Concurrent Cohorts Within the Ontario Breast Screening Program.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarelli; Kristina M Blackmore; Lucia Mirea; Susan J Done; Vicky Majpruz; Ashini Weerasinghe; Linda Rabeneck; Derek Muradali
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Effect of screening result on waiting times to assessment and breast cancer diagnosis: results from the Ontario Breast Screening Program.

Authors:  Anna M Chiarelli; Verna Mai; Erika E Halapy; Rene S Shumak; Frances P O'Malley; Neil S Klar
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

10.  Measuring psychological consequences of screening: adaptation of the psychological consequences questionnaire into Dutch.

Authors:  A J Rijnsburger; M L Essink-Bot; E van As; J Cockburn; H J de Koning
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.