Nam Hee Kim1, Hyo-Joon Yang1, Soo-Kyung Park1, Jung Ho Park1, Dong Il Park1, Chong Il Sohn1, Kyuyong Choi1, Yoon Suk Jung2. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29, Saemunan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03181, Korea. 2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 29, Saemunan-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03181, Korea. ys810.jung@samsung.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) less sensitively detects proximal advanced neoplasia (AN) compared to distal AN. Low threshold value use may improve proximal AN detection. AIM: To investigate whether FIT diagnostic accuracy for AN is different according to AN location and to compare FIT accuracy in proximal AN detection using different threshold values. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a university hospital in Korea from June 2013 to May 2015. Out of 34,547 participants who underwent FITs, 3990 subjects aged ≥50 years who also underwent colonoscopies were analyzed. The FIT diagnostic accuracy for AN with differing locations (proximal vs. distal) and threshold values (20, 15, and 10 mcg Hb/g feces) were assessed. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FIT in AN detection were 42.2, 84.3, 24.1, and 92.5 %, respectively. The FIT sensitivity for proximal AN detection was significantly lower than that for distal AN detection (32.7 and 49.0 %, respectively; P = 0.001). Lowering FIT threshold values tended to increase the sensitivity for proximal AN, whereas it significantly decreased the specificity for proximal AN. As a result, there was no significant difference in the accuracy for proximal AN detection (80.1, 79.3, and 78.1 % for 20, 15, and 10 mcg Hb/g feces, respectively; P = 0.107). CONCLUSIONS: FIT was less sensitive in proximal AN detection than distal AN detection. Lowering the FIT cutoff threshold did not increase the accuracy for proximal AN detection. New biomarker development for colorectal cancer screening is required to improve proximal ACRN diagnostic accuracy.
BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) less sensitively detects proximal advanced neoplasia (AN) compared to distal AN. Low threshold value use may improve proximal AN detection. AIM: To investigate whether FIT diagnostic accuracy for AN is different according to AN location and to compare FIT accuracy in proximal AN detection using different threshold values. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a university hospital in Korea from June 2013 to May 2015. Out of 34,547 participants who underwent FITs, 3990 subjects aged ≥50 years who also underwent colonoscopies were analyzed. The FIT diagnostic accuracy for AN with differing locations (proximal vs. distal) and threshold values (20, 15, and 10 mcg Hb/g feces) were assessed. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FIT in AN detection were 42.2, 84.3, 24.1, and 92.5 %, respectively. The FIT sensitivity for proximal AN detection was significantly lower than that for distal AN detection (32.7 and 49.0 %, respectively; P = 0.001). Lowering FIT threshold values tended to increase the sensitivity for proximal AN, whereas it significantly decreased the specificity for proximal AN. As a result, there was no significant difference in the accuracy for proximal AN detection (80.1, 79.3, and 78.1 % for 20, 15, and 10 mcg Hb/g feces, respectively; P = 0.107). CONCLUSIONS: FIT was less sensitive in proximal AN detection than distal AN detection. Lowering the FIT cutoff threshold did not increase the accuracy for proximal AN detection. New biomarker development for colorectal cancer screening is required to improve proximal ACRN diagnostic accuracy.
Authors: Maw-Soan Soon; Richard A Kozarek; Kamran Ayub; Anny Soon; Tin-Yu Lin; Otto S Lin Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Enrique Quintero; Antoni Castells; Luis Bujanda; Joaquín Cubiella; Dolores Salas; Ángel Lanas; Montserrat Andreu; Fernando Carballo; Juan Diego Morillas; Cristina Hernández; Rodrigo Jover; Isabel Montalvo; Juan Arenas; Eva Laredo; Vicent Hernández; Felipe Iglesias; Estela Cid; Raquel Zubizarreta; Teresa Sala; Marta Ponce; Mercedes Andrés; Gloria Teruel; Antonio Peris; María-Pilar Roncales; Mónica Polo-Tomás; Xavier Bessa; Olga Ferrer-Armengou; Jaume Grau; Anna Serradesanferm; Akiko Ono; José Cruzado; Francisco Pérez-Riquelme; Inmaculada Alonso-Abreu; Mariola de la Vega-Prieto; Juana Maria Reyes-Melian; Guillermo Cacho; José Díaz-Tasende; Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada; Carmen Poves; Cecilio Santander; Andrés González-Navarro Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: T R de Wijkerslooth; E M Stoop; P M Bossuyt; G A Meijer; M van Ballegooijen; A H C van Roon; I Stegeman; R A Kraaijenhagen; P Fockens; M E van Leerdam; E Dekker; E J Kuipers Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-07-31 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Graeme P Young; Erin L Symonds; James E Allison; Stephen R Cole; Callum G Fraser; Stephen P Halloran; Ernst J Kuipers; Helen E Seaman Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Chi Thi-Du Tran; Mai Vu-Tuyet Nguyen; Mo Thi Tran; Thuy Thi-Van Tuong; Quang Hong Tran; Linh Cu Le; Huong Thi-Thu Pham; Nam Chi Bui; Hien Huy Vu; Tu Thi-Cam Nguyen; Phuong Que Ta; Hien Thi-Thu Ha; Dung Tuan Trinh; Hanh Thi-My Bui; Dien Quang Trinh; Khanh Van Nguyen; Song Huu Le; Khien Van Vu; Thuan Van Tran; Huong Thi-Thanh Tran; Martha J Shrubsole; Fei Ye; Qiuyin Cai; Wei Zheng; Paolo Boffetta; Xiao-Ou Shu; Hung N Luu Journal: Jpn J Clin Oncol Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 2.925
Authors: Kevin Selby; Christopher D Jensen; Jeffrey K Lee; Chyke A Doubeni; Joanne E Schottinger; Wei K Zhao; Jessica Chubak; Ethan Halm; Nirupa R Ghai; Richard Contreras; Celette Skinner; Aruna Kamineni; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kevin Selby; Emma H Levine; Cecilia Doan; Anton Gies; Hermann Brenner; Charles Quesenberry; Jeffrey K Lee; Douglas A Corley Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: María Gallardo-Gómez; Sebastian Moran; María Páez de la Cadena; Vicenta Soledad Martínez-Zorzano; Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Berrocal; Mar Rodríguez-Girondo; Manel Esteller; Joaquín Cubiella; Luis Bujanda; Antoni Castells; Francesc Balaguer; Rodrigo Jover; Loretta De Chiara Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 6.551
Authors: Orouba Almilaji; Carla Smith; Sue Surgenor; Andrew Clegg; Elizabeth Williams; Peter Thomas; Jonathon Snook Journal: BMJ Open Gastroenterol Date: 2020-05