Literature DB >> 22850431

Immunochemical fecal occult blood testing is equally sensitive for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia.

T R de Wijkerslooth1, E M Stoop, P M Bossuyt, G A Meijer, M van Ballegooijen, A H C van Roon, I Stegeman, R A Kraaijenhagen, P Fockens, M E van Leerdam, E Dekker, E J Kuipers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is increasingly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to estimate its diagnostic accuracy in invitational population screening measured against colonoscopy.
METHODS: Participants (50-75 years) in an invitational primary colonoscopy screening program were asked to complete one sample FIT before colonoscopy. We estimated FIT sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values in detecting CRC and advanced neoplasia (carcinomas and advanced adenomas) for cutoff levels of 50 (FIT50), 75 (FIT75), and 100 (FIT100) ng hemoglobin (Hb)/ml, corresponding with, respectively, 10, 15 and 20 μg Hb/g feces.
RESULTS: A total of 1,256 participants underwent a FIT and screening colonoscopy. Advanced neoplasia was detected by colonoscopy in 119 (9%), 8 (0.6%) of them had CRC. At FIT50, 121 (10%) had a positive test result; 45 (37%) had advanced neoplasia and 7 (6%) had CRC. A total of 74 of 1,135 FIT50 negatives (7%) had advanced neoplasia including 1 (0.1%) CRC. FIT50 had a sensitivity of 38% (95% confidence interval (CI): 29-47) for advanced neoplasia and 88% (95% CI: 37-99) for CRC at a specificity of 93% (95% CI: 92-95) and 91% (95% CI: 89-92), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values for FIT50 were 6% (95% CI: 3-12) and almost 100% (95% CI: 99-100) for CRC, and 37% (95% CI: 29-46) and 93% (95% CI: 92-95) for advanced neoplasia. The sensitivity and specificity of FIT75 for advanced neoplasia were 33% (95% CI: 25-42) and 96% (95% CI: 94-97). At FIT100, 71 screenees (6%) had a positive test result. The sensitivity and specificity of FIT100 were for advanced neoplasia 31% (95% CI: 23-40) and 97% (95% CI: 96-98), and for CRC 75% (95% CI: 36-96) and 95% (95% CI: 93-96). The area under curve for detecting advanced neoplasia was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64-0.76). FIT had a similar sensitivity for proximal and distal advanced neoplasia at cutoffs of 50 (38% vs. 37%; P=0.99), 75 (33% vs. 31%; P=0.85) and 100 (33% vs. 29%; P=0.68) ng Hb/ml. DISCUSSION: Nine out of ten screening participants with CRC and four out of ten with advanced neoplasia will be detected using one single FIT at low cutoff. Sensitivity in detecting proximal and distal advanced neoplasia is comparable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22850431     DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  75 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer: Strategies to minimize interval CRC in screening programmes.

Authors:  Evelien Dekker; Silvia Sanduleanu
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Uptake and positive predictive value of fecal occult blood tests: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jessica Chubak; Andy Bogart; Sharon Fuller; Sharon S Laing; Beverly B Green
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 3.  FIT testing: an overview.

Authors:  Lukejohn W Day; Taft Bhuket; James Allison
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-11

Review 4.  Accuracy of fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Elizabeth G Liles; Stephen Bent; Theodore R Levin; Douglas A Corley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Does Low Threshold Value Use Improve Proximal Neoplasia Detection by Fecal Immunochemical Test?

Authors:  Nam Hee Kim; Hyo-Joon Yang; Soo-Kyung Park; Jung Ho Park; Dong Il Park; Chong Il Sohn; Kyuyong Choi; Yoon Suk Jung
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: The gender dilemma.

Authors:  Esmée J Grobbee; Els Wieten; Bettina E Hansen; Esther M Stoop; Thomas R de Wijkerslooth; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Patrick M Bossuyt; Evelien Dekker; Ernst J Kuipers; Manon Cw Spaander
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 7.  Diagnostic performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: meta-analysis and modeling.

Authors:  Tobias Niedermaier; Korbinian Weigl; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Test characteristics of faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) compared with optical colonoscopy.

Authors:  Barcey T Levy; Camden Bay; Yinghui Xu; Jeanette M Daly; George Bergus; Jeffrey Dunkelberg; Carol Moss
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 2.136

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; Jeffrey K Lee; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.