Literature DB >> 35383373

Findings from the first colorectal cancer screening among 103 542 individuals in Vietnam with systematic review of colorectal cancer screening programs in Asia-Pacific region.

Chi Thi-Du Tran1,2,3, Mai Vu-Tuyet Nguyen1, Mo Thi Tran1, Thuy Thi-Van Tuong1, Quang Hong Tran1, Linh Cu Le2, Huong Thi-Thu Pham4, Nam Chi Bui4, Hien Huy Vu4, Tu Thi-Cam Nguyen4, Phuong Que Ta4, Hien Thi-Thu Ha5, Dung Tuan Trinh5,6, Hanh Thi-My Bui5, Dien Quang Trinh5, Khanh Van Nguyen5, Song Huu Le7, Khien Van Vu8, Thuan Van Tran9,10, Huong Thi-Thanh Tran10, Martha J Shrubsole11, Fei Ye11, Qiuyin Cai11, Wei Zheng11, Paolo Boffetta12,13, Xiao-Ou Shu11, Hung N Luu14,15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is a leading cancer incidence and cause of death worldwide and in Vietnam. Although screening is considered an effective measure to prevent and control colorectal cancer, there is no such effort in Vietnam.
METHODS: Between 01 January 2018 and 31 October 2019, a population-based colorectal cancer screening program was conducted in Hanoi, Vietnam. A health advocacy campaign and follow-up phone calls were used to enroll residents aged ≥40 years old to complete an immunochemical-fecal occult blood testing. Positive immunochemical-fecal occult blood testing was followed by a colonoscopy. We also conducted a systematic review of the colorectal cancer screening programs in the Asia-Pacific region that used similar approach by searching Ovid Medline and PubMed databases.
RESULTS: During study period, 103 542 individuals among 672 742 eligible residents attended the screening of whom 81.5% participants finished immunochemical-fecal occult blood testing test and the positive rate was 6.1%. The coverage rate for immunochemical-fecal occult blood testing test was 11.9%. Among 2278 individuals who underwent colonoscopy, 3.5% were histologically diagnosed with cancer, 17.8% with advanced adenomas, and 23.1% with non-advanced adenomas. Males had significantly higher detection rate of advanced adenomas, cancer or ≥ two polyps/tumor than females (P < 0.0001). The systematic review showed that in two-step modality (i.e. immunochemical-fecal occult blood testing/fecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy), the test positive was from 4.1 to 10.6%. Once colonoscopy was performed subsequently, the rate of cancer among positive participants was from 1.7 to 16.4% and that of advanced adenomas was from 7.1 to 23.1%.
CONCLUSION: We showed that the two-step modality is a promising strategy for colorectal cancer screening in Vietnam that might apply to similar settings with limited resources.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Vietnam; adenomas; colorectal cancer; colorectal polyps; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35383373      PMCID: PMC9264238          DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0368-2811            Impact factor:   2.925


  44 in total

Review 1.  ABC of colorectal cancer. Molecular basis for risk factors.

Authors:  R G Hardy; S J Meltzer; J A Jankowski
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-07

2.  An occupational GI cancer screening program.

Authors:  Y Tatsumi; H Nishida; P Rozen
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Diagnostic Accuracy of a Qualitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Varies With Location of Neoplasia But Not Number of Specimens.

Authors:  Martin C S Wong; Jessica Y L Ching; Victor C W Chan; Thomas Y T Lam; Jeffrey P Shum; Arthur K C Luk; Sunny S H Wong; Siew C Ng; Simon S M Ng; Justin C Y Wu; Francis K L Chan; Joseph J Y Sung
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Estimation of the optimal cut off point in a new immunological faecal occult blood test in a corporate colorectal cancer screening programme.

Authors:  M Itoh; K Takahashi; H Nishida; K Sakagami; T Okubo
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Colorectal cancer mass screening event utilising quantitative faecal occult blood test.

Authors:  M H Chew; N Suzanah; K S Ho; J F Lim; B S Ooi; C L Tang; K W Eu
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 6.  Recommended intervals between screening and surveillance colonoscopies.

Authors:  Todd H Baron; Thomas C Smyrk; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  High prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in the Thai population: a prospective screening colonoscopy of 1,404 cases.

Authors:  Bunchorn Siripongpreeda; Chulabhorn Mahidol; Navara Dusitanond; Tassanee Sriprayoon; Bunlung Muyphuag; Thaniya Sricharunrat; Narongchai Teerayatanakul; Watanya Chaiwong; Wipra Worasawate; Prassanee Sattayarungsee; Juthamas Sangthongdee; Jirapa Prarom; Gaidganok Sornsamdang; Kamonwan Soonklang; Kasiruck Wittayasak; Chirayu U Auewarakul
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Risk and Characteristics of Postcolonoscopy Interval Colorectal Cancer after a Positive Fecal Test: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea.

Authors:  Chang Kyun Lee; Kui Son Choi; Chang Soo Eun; Dong-Il Park; Dong Soo Han; Minjoo Yoon; Mina Suh; Jae Kwan Jun
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 9.  Which Fecal Immunochemical Test Should I Choose?

Authors:  Jeanette M Daly; Yinghui Xu; Barcey T Levy
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2017-04-27

10.  Mass screening for colorectal cancer in a population of two million older adults in Guangzhou, China.

Authors:  Guozhen Lin; Zhiqiang Feng; Huazhang Liu; Yan Li; Yuqiang Nie; Yingru Liang; Ke Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.