Literature DB >> 22356323

Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening.

Enrique Quintero1, Antoni Castells, Luis Bujanda, Joaquín Cubiella, Dolores Salas, Ángel Lanas, Montserrat Andreu, Fernando Carballo, Juan Diego Morillas, Cristina Hernández, Rodrigo Jover, Isabel Montalvo, Juan Arenas, Eva Laredo, Vicent Hernández, Felipe Iglesias, Estela Cid, Raquel Zubizarreta, Teresa Sala, Marta Ponce, Mercedes Andrés, Gloria Teruel, Antonio Peris, María-Pilar Roncales, Mónica Polo-Tomás, Xavier Bessa, Olga Ferrer-Armengou, Jaume Grau, Anna Serradesanferm, Akiko Ono, José Cruzado, Francisco Pérez-Riquelme, Inmaculada Alonso-Abreu, Mariola de la Vega-Prieto, Juana Maria Reyes-Melian, Guillermo Cacho, José Díaz-Tasende, Alberto Herreros-de-Tejada, Carmen Poves, Cecilio Santander, Andrés González-Navarro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) are accepted strategies for colorectal-cancer screening in the average-risk population.
METHODS: In this randomized, controlled trial involving asymptomatic adults 50 to 69 years of age, we compared one-time colonoscopy in 26,703 subjects with FIT every 2 years in 26,599 subjects. The primary outcome was the rate of death from colorectal cancer at 10 years. This interim report describes rates of participation, diagnostic findings, and occurrence of major complications at completion of the baseline screening. Study outcomes were analyzed in both intention-to-screen and as-screened populations.
RESULTS: The rate of participation was higher in the FIT group than in the colonoscopy group (34.2% vs. 24.6%, P<0.001). Colorectal cancer was found in 30 subjects (0.1%) in the colonoscopy group and 33 subjects (0.1%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 1.64; P=0.99). Advanced adenomas were detected in 514 subjects (1.9%) in the colonoscopy group and 231 subjects (0.9%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.97 to 2.69; P<0.001), and nonadvanced adenomas were detected in 1109 subjects (4.2%) in the colonoscopy group and 119 subjects (0.4%) in the FIT group (odds ratio, 9.80; 95% CI, 8.10 to 11.85; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects in the FIT group were more likely to participate in screening than were those in the colonoscopy group. On the baseline screening examination, the numbers of subjects in whom colorectal cancer was detected were similar in the two study groups, but more adenomas were identified in the colonoscopy group. (Funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00906997.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22356323     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1108895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  253 in total

1.  Gastrointestinal cancer: Should colonoscopy be a primary test in CRC screening?

Authors:  Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  [Are we convinced of our role in the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer?].

Authors:  M Marzo-Castillejo; J Mascort Roca; A Pastor Rodríguez-Moñino
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Editorial: Colorectal Cancer Screening Education in Medically Vulnerable Populations: the Role of the Journal of Cancer Education.

Authors:  John T Vetto
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Emergent Colectomy Is Independently Associated with Decreased Long-Term Overall Survival in Colon Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Zhaomin Xu; Adan Z Becerra; Christopher T Aquina; Bradley J Hensley; Carla F Justiniano; Courtney Boodry; Alex A Swanger; Reza Arsalanizadeh; Katia Noyes; John R Monson; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Spiritually based intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among African Americans: screening and theory-based outcomes from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Cheryl L Holt; Mark S Litaker; Isabel C Scarinci; Katrina J Debnam; Chastity McDavid; Sandre F McNeal; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Martha Crowther; John Bolland; Michelle Y Martin
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2012-10-02

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer screening--optimizing current strategies and new directions.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; Thomas Rösch; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Academic hospital staff compliance with a fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening program.

Authors:  Georgia Vlachonikolou; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Athanasios D Sioulas; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Anastasia Melissaratou; Giannis-Aimant Moustafa; Eleni Xanthopoulou; Gerasimos Tsilimidos; Ioanna Tsironi; Paraskevas Filippidis; Chrysoula Malli; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-08-15

8.  Can we achieve an 80% screening rate for colorectal cancer by 2018 in the United States?

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Fadlo R Khuri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Cost-effectiveness of patient navigation to increase adherence with screening colonoscopy among minority individuals.

Authors:  Uri Ladabaum; Ajitha Mannalithara; Lina Jandorf; Steven H Itzkowitz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Douglas J Robertson; Jeffrey K Lee; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.