Literature DB >> 23742373

Explaining coherence in coherence masking protection for adults and children.

Eric Tarr1, Susan Nittrouer.   

Abstract

Coherence masking protection (CMP) is the phenomenon in which a low-frequency target (typically a first formant) is labeled accurately in poorer signal-to-noise levels when combined with a high-frequency cosignal, rather than presented alone. An earlier study by the authors revealed greater CMP for children than adults, with more resistance to disruptions in harmonicity across spectral components [Nittrouer and Tarr (2011). Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 73, 2606-2623]. That finding was interpreted as demonstrating that children are obliged to process speech signals as broad spectral patterns, regardless of the harmonic structure of the spectral components. The current study tested three alternative, auditory explanations for the observed coherence of target + cosignal: (1) unique spectral shapes of target + cosignal support labeling, (2) periodicity of target + cosignal promotes coherence, and (3) temporal synchrony across target + cosignal reinforces temporal expectancies. Adults, eight-year-olds, and five-year-olds labeled stimuli in five conditions: F1 only and F1 + a constant cosignal (both used previously) were benchmarks for comparing thresholds for F1 + 3 new cosignals. Children again showed greater CMP than adults, but none of the three hypotheses could explain their CMP. It was again concluded that children are obliged to recognize speech signals as broad spectral patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23742373      PMCID: PMC3689784          DOI: 10.1121/1.4802638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  On the bistability of sine wave analogues of speech.

Authors:  R E Remez; J S Pardo; R L Piorkowski; P E Rubin
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-01

2.  The effect of segmental order on fricative labeling by children and adults.

Authors:  S Nittrouer; M E Miller; C S Crowther; M J Manhart
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02

3.  Coherence in children's speech perception.

Authors:  S Nittrouer; C S Crowther
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Imitation and the emergence of segments.

Authors:  M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2000 Apr-Dec       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-12

6.  Developmental weighting shifts for noise components of fricative-vowel syllables.

Authors:  S Nittrouer; M E Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Learning to perceive speech: how fricative perception changes, and how it stays the same.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Coherence masking protection in speech sounds: the role of formant synchrony.

Authors:  P C Gordon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1997-02

9.  Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT.

Authors:  A E Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Speech recognition for school-age children and adults tested in multi-tone vs multi-noise-band maskers.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Developmental Effects in Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.

Authors:  Mary M Flaherty; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.