Literature DB >> 27103287

Viewing your digital radiographs: which monitor is best?

D McIlgorm1.   

Abstract

Many dental practitioners use flat panel monitors in their practices on a daily basis, and for those practitioners who have made the move to digital imaging, the use of this device often extends to viewing digital radiographs. Monitors that present good quality images should be used and the image quality should be checked. This article provides practitioners with some of the key areas they should consider when selecting or buying a flat panel monitor for dental radiology purposes.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27103287     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  8 in total

1.  Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.

Authors:  Soili Kallio-Pulkkinen; Sisko Huumonen; Marianne Haapea; Esa Liukkonen; Annina Sipola; Osmo Tervonen; Miika T Nieminen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Mats Geijer; Lillemor Forsberg; Susanne Kheddache; Patrik Sund
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Display considerations for hospital-wide viewing of soft copy images.

Authors:  D S Brettle
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Medical grade vs off-the-shelf color displays: influence on observer performance and visual search.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  The effect of aging on luminance of standard liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors.

Authors:  Kristina Hellén-Halme; Bengt Hellén-Halme; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2011-06-12

6.  Comparison between DICOM-calibrated and uncalibrated consumer grade and 6-MP displays under different lighting conditions in panoramic radiography.

Authors:  S Kallio-Pulkkinen; M Haapea; E Liukkonen; S Huumonen; O Tervonen; M T Nieminen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.

Authors:  D J McIlgorm; J P McNulty
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Could standardizing "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitors to the DICOM part 14: GSDF improve the presentation of dental images? A visual grading characteristics analysis.

Authors:  D J McIlgorm; C Lawinski; S Ng; J P McNulty
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Digital Radiography, Conventional Film and Self-Developing Film for Working Length Determination.

Authors:  Manucher Raees Sameye; Amin Mohammad Bahalkeh; Arash Izadi; Ania Jafaryan
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2018

2.  Impact of viewing conditions on the performance assessment of different computer monitors used for dental diagnostics.

Authors:  Thomas Hastie; Sascha Venske-Parker; Johan K M Aps
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-02-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.