Literature DB >> 24807756

Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence and cancer-specific death for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: comparison to American Joint Committee on Cancer staging classification.

Behfar Ehdaie1, Shahrokh F Shariat2, Caroline Savage3, Jonathan Coleman4, Guido Dalbagni4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to develop prognostic models to predict disease recurrence and cancerspecific mortality in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 253 patients treated with RNU between 1995 and 2008 at a single high-volume tertiary referral center were analyzed. Statistically and clinically significant patient and tumor characteristics were identified in a univariate analysis and incorporated into a multivariable Cox regression model. The model was compared to the 2010 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging classification using the concordance index (c-index), corrected for statistical optimism using bootstrap methods.
RESULTS: Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 73% [95% confidence interval (CI): 66-79%)] and 78% (95% CI: 71-84%), respectively. On multivariate analysis, higher preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was associated with better CSS [hazard ratio (HR) per 1 mL/min/m2 increase in GFR for CSS: 0.74; P = .002)], while higher pathologic stage (HR for pT2: 2.99 and for ≥ pT3: 7.34; P < .001) and lymph node involvement (HR: 3.75; P < .001) were associated with worse CSS; results were similar for RFS. The ability of the final models, which included preoperative GFR, lymph node status, pathologic grade, and stage, to predict RFS and CSS (c-index 0.82 and 0.83, respectively) was similar to that of the 2010 AJCC staging classification (c-index 0.80 and 0.81, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Given the data-dependent selection of variables in this single institution cohort, it is unlikely that the marginal improvement found with these prediction models would importantly impact clinical decision-making or improve patient care. The 2010 AJCC staging classification alone is very accurate and should continue to guide follow-up after RNU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24807756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol J        ISSN: 1735-1308            Impact factor:   1.510


  10 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic factors and predictive tools for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Morgan Rouprêt; Ashish M Kamat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Giacomo Novara; Jay D Raman; Christian Seitz; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Gender differences in incidence and outcomes of urothelial and kidney cancer.

Authors:  Ilaria Lucca; Tobias Klatte; Harun Fajkovic; Michela de Martino; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Can lymphovascular invasion replace the prognostic value of lymph node involvement in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy?

Authors:  Eun Sang Yoo; Yun-Sok Ha; Jun Nyung Lee; Bum Soo Kim; Bup Wan Kim; Seok-Soo Byun; Young Deuk Choi; Ho Won Kang; Seok-Joong Yun; Wun-Jae Kim; Jeong Hyun Kim; Tae Gyun Kwon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Preoperative Underweight Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Survive Less after Radical Nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Ho Won Kang; Hae Do Jung; Yun-Sok Ha; Tae-Hwan Kim; Tae Gyun Kwon; Seok-Soo Byun; Seok-Joong Yun; Wun-Jae Kim; Young Deuk Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 5.  Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Aurélie Mbeutcha; Romain Mathieu; Morgan Rouprêt; Kilian M Gust; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-10

Review 6.  Association between demographic factors and prognosis in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hyung Suk Kim; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-31

7.  Developing a prediction model for disease-free survival from upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in the Korean population.

Authors:  Sung Han Kim; Mi Kyung Song; Bumsik Hong; Seok Ho Kang; Byong Chang Jeong; Ja Hyun Ku; Ho Kyung Seo
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Can American Joint Committee on Cancer prognostic groups be individualized in patients undergoing surgery for Stage IV invasive upper tract Urothelial Carcinoma?

Authors:  Zaishang Li; Xueying Li; Ying Liu; Jiequn Fang; Xueqi Zhang; Kefeng Xiao
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Development and validation of prognostic nomograms and a web-based survival rate calculator for sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma in pre- and post-treatment patients.

Authors:  Tong Yang; Yaohai Wu; You Zuo; Shuai Fu; Zhonghua Xu; Nengwang Yu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-02

10.  Bladder metastasis presenting as neck, arm and thorax pain: a case report.

Authors:  Clinton J Daniels; Pamela J Wakefield; Glenn A Bub
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2016-05-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.