OBJECTIVES: New biomarkers are being developed to identify individuals at risk for cancer, detect disease earlier, determine prognosis, detect recurrence, predict response to particular agents, and monitor response to treatment. This article attempts to address some of the challenges facing the research and medical communities in the delivery of new biomarkers for individualized medicine. METHODS: A variety of issues and barriers can affect the transfer of clinical tests from research to clinical practice. Differences in sample collection, handling or storage, and profiling techniques may influence the protein profile obtained by any method. RESULTS: Standard procedures and quality check schemes are necessary because there is a lack of definition to guarantee reproducibility of new procedures. From technical and economic viewpoints, the assay has to be sufficiently robust to be completed in community-based hospitals. Although traditionally cancer patients were treated with drugs of low toxicity or of high tolerance regardless of their efficacy in a given patient if the benefits of that drug are proven in both experimental and clinical conditions, recent advances have provided opportunities to adapt "tailored" treatment modalities. The evolving trend is the usage of patterns of markers instead of a single marker. Further challenges in biomarker development are in finding the relevant markers that have the right degree of specificity and sensitivity and a reliable test to measure the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Discovery, testing, and validation of clinically appropriate and commercially useful tumor markers should permit individualization of therapy.
OBJECTIVES: New biomarkers are being developed to identify individuals at risk for cancer, detect disease earlier, determine prognosis, detect recurrence, predict response to particular agents, and monitor response to treatment. This article attempts to address some of the challenges facing the research and medical communities in the delivery of new biomarkers for individualized medicine. METHODS: A variety of issues and barriers can affect the transfer of clinical tests from research to clinical practice. Differences in sample collection, handling or storage, and profiling techniques may influence the protein profile obtained by any method. RESULTS: Standard procedures and quality check schemes are necessary because there is a lack of definition to guarantee reproducibility of new procedures. From technical and economic viewpoints, the assay has to be sufficiently robust to be completed in community-based hospitals. Although traditionally cancerpatients were treated with drugs of low toxicity or of high tolerance regardless of their efficacy in a given patient if the benefits of that drug are proven in both experimental and clinical conditions, recent advances have provided opportunities to adapt "tailored" treatment modalities. The evolving trend is the usage of patterns of markers instead of a single marker. Further challenges in biomarker development are in finding the relevant markers that have the right degree of specificity and sensitivity and a reliable test to measure the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Discovery, testing, and validation of clinically appropriate and commercially useful tumor markers should permit individualization of therapy.
Authors: Francesco Soria; Marco Moschini; Andrea Haitel; Gregory J Wirth; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood; Morgan Rouprêt; Vitaly Margulis; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Jay D Raman; Solene-Florence Kammerer-Jacquet; Romain Mathieu; Karim Bensalah; Yair Lotan; Mehmet Özsoy; Mesut Remzi; Kilian M Gust; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Aurélie Mbeutcha; Morgan Rouprêt; Ashish M Kamat; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Giacomo Novara; Jay D Raman; Christian Seitz; Evanguelos Xylinas; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Michela de Martino; Shahrokh F Shariat; Sebastian L Hofbauer; Ilaria Lucca; Christopher Taus; Helene G Wiener; Andrea Haitel; Martin Susani; Tobias Klatte Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-02-23 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Romain Mathieu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Christian Seitz; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Harun Fajkovic; Maxine Sun; Yair Lotan; Douglas S Scherr; Ashutosh Tewari; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Morgan Rouprêt; Ilaria Lucca; Vitaly Margulis; Michael Rink; Luis A Kluth; Malte Rieken; Alexander Bachman; Evanguelos Xylinas; Brian D Robinson; Karim Bensalah; Markus Margreiter Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-10-26 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Thomas F Chromecki; Karim Bensalah; Mesut Remzi; Grégory Verhoest; Eugene K Cha; Douglas S Scherr; Giacomo Novara; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: S F Shepherd; N D McGuire; B P J de Lacy Costello; R J Ewen; D H Jayasena; K Vaughan; I Ahmed; C S Probert; N M Ratcliffe Journal: J Breath Res Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 3.262
Authors: Aurélie Mbeutcha; Ilaria Lucca; Vitaly Margulis; Jose A Karam; Christopher G Wood; Michela de Martino; Romain Mathieu; Andrea Haitel; Evanguelos Xylinas; Luis Kluth; Morgan Rouprêt; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Alberto Briganti; Michael Rink; Malte Rieken; Alon Z Weizer; Jay D Raman; Nathalie Rioux-Leclecq; Christian Bolenz; Karim Bensalah; Yair Lotan; Christian Seitz; Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Tobias Klatte Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 4.226