Yasir Q Mohsin1, Sajan Goud Lingala2, Edward DiBella3, Mathews Jacob1. 1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the University of Iowa, Iowa, USA. 2. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Southern California, California, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, the University of Utah, Utah, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To introduce a fast algorithm for motion-compensated accelerated dynamic MRI. METHODS: An efficient patch smoothness regularization scheme, which implicitly compensates for inter-frame motion, is introduced to recover dynamic MRI data from highly undersampled measurements. The regularization prior is a sum of distances between each rectangular patch in the dataset with other patches in the dataset using a saturating distance metric. Unlike current motion estimation and motion compensation (ME-MC) methods, the proposed scheme does not require reference frames or complex motion models. The proposed algorithm, which alternates between inter-patch shrinkage step and conjugate gradient algorithm, is considerably more computationally efficient than ME-MC methods. The reconstructions obtained using the proposed algorithm is compared against state-of-the-art methods. RESULTS: The proposed method is observed to yield reconstructions with minimal spatiotemporal blurring and motion artifacts. In comparison to the existing state-of-the-art ME-MC methods, PRICE provides comparable or even better image quality with faster reconstruction times (approximately nine times faster). CONCLUSION: The presented scheme enables computationally efficient and effective motion-compensated reconstruction in a variety of applications with large inter-frame motion and contrast changes. This algorithm could be seen as an alternative over the current state-of-the-art ME-MC schemes that are computationally expensive. Magn Reson Med 77:1238-1248, 2017.
PURPOSE: To introduce a fast algorithm for motion-compensated accelerated dynamic MRI. METHODS: An efficient patch smoothness regularization scheme, which implicitly compensates for inter-frame motion, is introduced to recover dynamic MRI data from highly undersampled measurements. The regularization prior is a sum of distances between each rectangular patch in the dataset with other patches in the dataset using a saturating distance metric. Unlike current motion estimation and motion compensation (ME-MC) methods, the proposed scheme does not require reference frames or complex motion models. The proposed algorithm, which alternates between inter-patch shrinkage step and conjugate gradient algorithm, is considerably more computationally efficient than ME-MC methods. The reconstructions obtained using the proposed algorithm is compared against state-of-the-art methods. RESULTS: The proposed method is observed to yield reconstructions with minimal spatiotemporal blurring and motion artifacts. In comparison to the existing state-of-the-art ME-MC methods, PRICE provides comparable or even better image quality with faster reconstruction times (approximately nine times faster). CONCLUSION: The presented scheme enables computationally efficient and effective motion-compensated reconstruction in a variety of applications with large inter-frame motion and contrast changes. This algorithm could be seen as an alternative over the current state-of-the-art ME-MC schemes that are computationally expensive. Magn Reson Med 77:1238-1248, 2017.
Authors: Viton Vitanis; Robert Manka; Daniel Giese; Henrik Pedersen; Sven Plein; Peter Boesiger; Sebastian Kozerke Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-10-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Anthony G Christodoulou; Haosen Zhang; Bo Zhao; T Kevin Hitchens; Chien Ho; Zhi-Pei Liang Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Manish Motwani; Neil Maredia; Timothy A Fairbairn; Sebastian Kozerke; Aleksandra Radjenovic; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-04-12 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Ganesh Adluru; Chris McGann; Peter Speier; Eugene G Kholmovski; Akram Shaaban; Edward V R Dibella Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Alexis Harrison; Ganesh Adluru; Kavitha Damal; Akram M Shaaban; Brent Wilson; Daniel Kim; Chris McGann; Nassir F Marrouche; Edward V R DiBella Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Ye Tian; Jason Mendes; Brent Wilson; Alexander Ross; Ravi Ranjan; Edward DiBella; Ganesh Adluru Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Tevfik F Ismail; Wendy Strugnell; Chiara Coletti; Maša Božić-Iven; Sebastian Weingärtner; Kerstin Hammernik; Teresa Correia; Thomas Küstner Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: Yu Y Li; Pengyue Zhang; Shams Rashid; Yang J Cheng; Wenhui Li; William Schapiro; Kathleen Gliganic; Ann-Marie Yamashita; Marie Grgas; Elizabeth Haag; J Jane Cao Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Ingo Hermann; Peter Kellman; Omer B Demirel; Mehmet Akçakaya; Lothar R Schad; Sebastian Weingärtner Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ye Tian; Jason Mendes; Apoorva Pedgaonkar; Mark Ibrahim; Leif Jensen; Joyce D Schroeder; Brent Wilson; Edward V R DiBella; Ganesh Adluru Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 3.240