Literature DB >> 2708880

Soiling: anorectal function and results of treatment.

R J Felt-Bersma1, J J Janssen, E C Klinkenberg-Knol, H F Hoitsma, S G Meuwissen.   

Abstract

Forty-five patients with soiling but without faecal incontinence were evaluated by means of anorectal function investigations (anal manometry, rectal capacity and saline infusion test). The causes of soiling and the effect of treatment on both soiling and anorectal function were studied. The results were compared with a control group of 161 patients without soiling or incontinence. The diagnoses were haemorrhoids (10), mucosal prolapse (7), rectal prolapse (6), fistulae (5), proctitis (3), faecal impaction (2), rectocele with intussusception (2), scars after fistulectomy (2) and others (8). Simple inspection and proctoscopy were generally sufficient to establish a diagnosis. For two patients the diagnosis rectocele was made after defaecography. Anorectal test results did not differ between the soiling and control group, did not contribute to establish a diagnosis and did not change after treatment. Only patients with a rectal prolapse had abnormal results in anorectal function tests: a low basal sphincter pressure and a limited continence reserve. Appropriate therapy resulted in complete recovery (44%) or improvement of symptoms (29%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2708880     DOI: 10.1007/BF01648548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

1.  Effects of age and sex on anorectal manometry.

Authors:  V Loening-Baucke; S Anuras
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  A prospective study of the effect of haemorrhoidectomy on sphincter function and faecal continence.

Authors:  M G Read; N W Read; W G Haynes; T C Donnelly; A G Johnson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  A clinical study of patients with fecal incontinence and diarrhea.

Authors:  N W Read; W V Harford; A C Schmulen; M G Read; C Santa Ana; J S Fordtran
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Urgency and fecal soiling in people with bowel dysfunction.

Authors:  D A Drossman; R S Sandler; C M Broom; D C McKee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Effect of age, gender, and parity on anal canal pressures. Contribution of impaired anal sphincter function to fecal incontinence.

Authors:  S M McHugh; N E Diamant
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  The role of partial denervation of the puborectalis in idiopathic faecal incontinence.

Authors:  D C Bartolo; J A Jarratt; M G Read; T C Donnelly; N W Read
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence.

Authors:  E S Kiff; M Swash
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  A manometric study of anorectal function after surgery for anal fistula, with special reference to incontinence.

Authors:  P Sainio
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1985

9.  Manometric evaluation of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence.

Authors:  D M Matheson; M R Keighley
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Clinical and manometric evaluation of anal sphincter function in patients with rectal prolapse.

Authors:  K M Hiltunen; M Matikainen; O Auvinen; P Hietanen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Anal manometry.

Authors:  R J Felt-Bersma; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  [Management of complications of fissure and fistula surgery].

Authors:  Andreas Ommer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Evaluation of anal incontinence: minimal approach, maximal effectiveness.

Authors:  Harry T Papaconstantinou
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-02

4.  Referral for anorectal function evaluation is indicated in 65% and beneficial in 92% of patients.

Authors:  Maria M Szojda; Erik Tanis; Chris J J Mulder; Richelle J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Conservative treatment of patients with faecal soiling.

Authors:  S J van der Hagen; P B Soeters; C G Baeten; W G van Gemert
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  A prospective non-randomized two-centre study of patients with passive faecal incontinence after birth trauma and patients with soiling after anal surgery, treated by elastomer implants versus rectal irrigation.

Authors:  S J van der Hagen; W van der Meer; P B Soeters; C G Baeten; W G van Gemert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Influence of rectal prolapse on the asymmetry of the anal sphincter in patients with anal incontinence.

Authors:  Henri Damon; Luc Henry; Sabine Roman; Xavier Barth; François Mion
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 3.067

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.