Literature DB >> 18186567

Referral for anorectal function evaluation is indicated in 65% and beneficial in 92% of patients.

Maria M Szojda1, Erik Tanis, Chris J J Mulder, Richelle J F Felt-Bersma.   

Abstract

AIM: To determine the indicated referrals to a tertiary centre for patients with anorectal symptoms, the effect of the advised treatment and the discomfort of the tests.
METHODS: In a retrospective study, patients referred for anorectal function evaluation (AFE) between May 2004 and October 2006 were sent a questionnaire, as were the doctors who referred them. AFE consisted of anal manometry, rectal compliance measurement and anal endosonography. An indicated referral was defined as needing AFE to establish a diagnosis with clinical consequence (fecal incontinence without diarrhea, 3rd degree anal sphincter rupture, congenital anorectal disorder, inflammatory bowel disease with anorectal complaints and preoperative in patients for re-anastomosis or enterostoma, anal fissure, fistula or constipation). Anal ultrasound is always indicated in patients with fistula, anal manometry and rectal compliance when impaired continence reserve is suspected. The therapeutic effect was noted as improvement, no improvement but reassurance, and deterioration.
RESULTS: From the 216 patients referred, 167 (78%) returned the questionnaire. The referrals were indicated in 65%. Of these, 80% followed the proposed advice. Improvement was achieved in 35% and a reassurance in 57% of the patients, no difference existed between patient groups. On a VAS scale (1 to 10) symptoms improved from 4.0 to 7.2. Most patients reported no or little discomfort with AFE.
CONCLUSION: Referral for AFE was indicated in 65%. Beneficial effect was seen in 92%: 35% improved and 57% was reassured. Advice was followed in 80%. Better instruction about indication for AFE referral is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18186567      PMCID: PMC2675126          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  36 in total

1.  The effect of anorectal manometry on the outcome of treatment in severe childhood constipation: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  R van Ginkel; H A Büller; G E Boeckxstaens; R N van Der Plas; J A Taminiau; M A Benninga
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Hemorrhoidectomy: indications and risks.

Authors:  René G Holzheimer
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2004-01-26       Impact factor: 2.175

3.  Prospective comparison of hydrogen peroxide-enhanced three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging of perianal fistulas.

Authors:  R L West; D D E Zimmerman; S Dwarkasing; S M Hussain; W C J Hop; W R Schouten; E J Kuipers; R J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Supplementation with dietary fiber improves fecal incontinence.

Authors:  D Z Bliss; H J Jung; K Savik; A Lowry; M LeMoine; L Jensen; C Werner; K Schaffer
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 5.  Manometry of the gastrointestinal tract: toy or tool?

Authors:  A J Smout
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  2001

6.  Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback for fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Christine Norton; Sonya Chelvanayagam; Jenifer Wilson-Barnett; Sally Redfern; Michael A Kamm
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Safety and effectiveness of temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal (Secca procedure) for the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jonathan E Efron; Marvin L Corman; James Fleshman; Jeffrey Barnett; Deborah Nagle; Elisa Birnbaum; Eric G Weiss; Juan J Nogueras; Scott Sligh; John Rabine; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal for the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Takeshi Takahashi; Sandra Garcia-Osogobio; Miguel Angel Valdovinos; Wilbert Mass; Ramiro Jimenez; Luis Alfonso Jauregui; Juan Bobadilla; Carlos Belmonte; Peter S Edelstein; David S Utley
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Rectocele repair improves evacuation and prolapse complaints independent of anorectal function and colonic transit time.

Authors:  C E J Sloots; A J Meulen; R J F Felt-Bersma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Does water-perfused catheter overdiagnose anismus compared to balloon probe?

Authors:  G Savoye; A M Leroi; P Bertot-Sassigneux; J Y Touchais; G Devroede; P Denis
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  2 in total

1.  Frequency, spectrum, and factors associated with fecal evacuation disorders among patients with chronic constipation referred to a tertiary care center in northern India.

Authors:  Uday C Ghoshal; Abhai Verma; Asha Misra
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-04

2.  Duration taken for the anal sphincter pressures to stabilize prior to anorectal manometry.

Authors:  Dakshitha Praneeth Wickramasinghe; Umesh Jayarajah; Dharmabandhu Nandadeva Samarasekera
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-06-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.