Literature DB >> 3963307

Clinical and manometric evaluation of anal sphincter function in patients with rectal prolapse.

K M Hiltunen, M Matikainen, O Auvinen, P Hietanen.   

Abstract

We studied 27 patients with rectal prolapse (7 men and 20 women). Eight patients were continent, 8 were partially incontinent, and 11 were totally incontinent. Perineal descent and an absent anocutaneous reflex were common findings, implying damage to the external anal sphincter and the pelvic floor muscles. Both partially and totally incontinent patients had significantly lower basal and voluntary contraction pressures compared with those of control subjects, which is in accordance with previous reports on the subject. Our continent patients had normal voluntary contraction pressures, but basal pressures were lower than those of the control subjects (p less than 0.02). This suggests that there may be dysfunction of the internal anal sphincter before the development of clinical symptoms of incontinence. The internal anal sphincter reflex was present in 19 patients (70 percent). It was absent in patients with very little tone of the anal canal. It seems that absence of the internal anal sphincter reflex is not invariably connected with rectal prolapse. The results of this study indicate that rectal prolapse is often associated with dysfunction of the anal sphincters, leading to incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3963307     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(86)90110-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  12 in total

1.  Comparison between a new electronic bidet and conventional sitz baths: a manometric evaluation of the anal resting pressure in normal healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S-B Ryoo; H-K Oh; E C Han; Y S Song; M S Seo; E K Choe; S H Moon; K J Park
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Improvement of continence after abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  K M Hiltunen; M Matikainen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Soiling: anorectal function and results of treatment.

Authors:  R J Felt-Bersma; J J Janssen; E C Klinkenberg-Knol; H F Hoitsma; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Abdominal rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: preliminary results of a new technique.

Authors:  Angelo Di Giorgio; Daniele Biacchi; Simone Sibio; Fabio Accarpio; Giovanni Sinibaldi; Lea Petrella; Francesca Romana Cappiello; Paolo Sammartino
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Charles H Knowles; Isabelle Mack; Allison Malcolm; Nicholas Oblizajek; Satish Rao; S Mark Scott; Andrea Shin; Paul Enck
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 65.038

6.  Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  P Luukkonen; U Mikkonen; H Järvinen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Comparison of recall and daily self-report of fecal incontinence severity.

Authors:  Katharine Fisher; Donna Z Bliss; Kay Savik
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.741

Review 8.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Stavros Gourgiotis; Sotirios Baratsis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  A single centre comparative study of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus suture rectopexy.

Authors:  Manash Ranjan Sahoo; Anil Kumar Thimmegowda; Manoj S Gowda
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Single port laparoscopic mesh rectopexy.

Authors:  Ghada Morshed Ahmed
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.