Literature DB >> 27087943

Reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy position statement.

Michael Bretthauer1, Lars Aabakken2, Evelien Dekker3, Michal F Kaminski4, Thomas Rösch5, Rolf Hultcrantz6, Stepan Suchanek7, Rodrigo Jover8, Ernst J Kuipers9, Raf Bisschops10, Cristiano Spada11, Roland Valori12, Dirk Domagk13, Colin Rees14, Matthew D Rutter14.   

Abstract

To develop standards for high quality of gastrointestinal endoscopy, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has established the ESGE Quality Improvement Committee. A prerequisite for quality assurance and improvement for all gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures is state-of-the-art integrated digital reporting systems for standardized documentation of the procedures. The current paper describes the ESGE's viewpoints on requirements for high-quality endoscopy reporting systems. The following recommendations are issued: Endoscopy reporting systems must be electronic.Endoscopy reporting systems should be integrated into hospital patient record systems.Endoscopy reporting systems should include patient identifiers to facilitate data linkage to other data sources.Endoscopy reporting systems shall restrict the use of free text entry to a minimum, and be based mainly on structured data entry.Separate entry of data for quality or research purposes is discouraged. Automatic data transfer for quality and research purposes must be facilitated.Double entry of data by the endoscopist or associate personnel is discouraged. Available data from outside sources (administrative or medical) must be made available automatically.Endoscopy reporting systems shall enable the inclusion of information on histopathology of detected lesions; patient's satisfaction; adverse events; surveillance recommendations.Endoscopy reporting systems must facilitate easy data retrieval at any time in a universally compatible format.Endoscopy reporting systems must include data fields for key performance indicators as defined by quality improvement committees.Endoscopy reporting systems must facilitate changes in indicators and data entry fields as required by professional organizations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality; colonoscopy; electronic patient files; guideline; reporting systems

Year:  2016        PMID: 27087943      PMCID: PMC4804380          DOI: 10.1177/2050640616629079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  12 in total

1.  Minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: results of prospective testing and validation in the GASTER project.

Authors:  M Delvaux; M Crespi; J R Armengol-Miro; F Hagenmüller; W Teuffel; K B Spencer; J Stettin; F M Zwiebel
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 2.  Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable.

Authors:  David Lieberman; Marion Nadel; Robert A Smith; Wendy Atkin; Subash B Duggirala; Robert Fletcher; Seth N Glick; C Daniel Johnson; Theodore R Levin; John B Pope; Michael B Potter; David Ransohoff; Douglas Rex; Robert Schoen; Paul Schroy; Sidney Winawer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Standardized endoscopic reporting.

Authors:  Lars Aabakken; Alan N Barkun; Peter B Cotton; Evgeny Fedorov; Masayuki A Fujino; Ekaterina Ivanova; Shin-Ei Kudo; Konstantin Kuznetzov; Thomas de Lange; Koji Matsuda; Olivier Moine; Björn Rembacken; Jean-Francois Rey; Joseph Romagnuolo; Thomas Rösch; Mandeep Sawhney; Kenshi Yao; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  Quality assurance as an integrated part of the electronic medical record - a prototype applied for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Geir Hoff; Per Marcus Ottestad; Stein Roger Skafløtten; Michael Bretthauer; Volker Moritz
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  A cost-benefit analysis of endoscopy reporting methods: handwritten, dictated and computerized.

Authors:  M J M Groenen; S Ajodhia; J Y F Wynstra; W Lesterhuis; E J H M van de Weijgert; E J Kuipers; R J T Ouwendijk
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Quality reporting - finally achievable?

Authors:  Lars Aabakken
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  A novel colonoscopy reporting system enabling quality assurance.

Authors:  Sascha C van Doorn; Joost van Vliet; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  The contents of free-text endoscopy reports: an inventory and evaluation by peers.

Authors:  P W Moorman; A M van Ginneken; J van der Lei; P D Siersema; M van Blankenstein; J H Wilson
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Administrative Database Research Overestimates the Rate of Interval Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan Gotfried; Marc Bernstein; Adam C Ehrlich; Frank K Friedenberg
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.062

10.  Gastrointestinal endoscopic terminology coding (GET-C): a WHO-approved extension of the ICD-10.

Authors:  Marcel J M Groenen; Willem Hirs; Henk Becker; Ernst J Kuipers; Gerard P Van Berge Henegouwen; Paul Fockens; Rob J Th Ouwendijk
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Marek Bugajski; Michael Bretthauer; Colin J Rees; Evelien Dekker; Geir Hoff; Rodrigo Jover; Stepan Suchanek; Monika Ferlitsch; John Anderson; Thomas Roesch; Rolf Hultcranz; Istvan Racz; Ernst J Kuipers; Kjetil Garborg; James E East; Maciej Rupinski; Birgitte Seip; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Silvia Minozzi; Raf Bisschops; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Quality in Colonoscopy: Beyond the Adenoma Detection Rate Fever.

Authors:  Filipe Taveira; Miguel Areia; Luís Elvas; Susana Alves; Daniel Brito; Sandra Saraiva; Ana Teresa Cadime
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-21

3.  Overcoming the barriers to dissemination and implementation of quality measures for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) position statement.

Authors:  Raf Bisschops; Matthew D Rutter; Miguel Areia; Dirk Domagk; Michel F Kaminski; Andrew Veitch; Wafaa Khanoussi; Ian M Gralnek; Cesare Hassan; Helmut Messmann; Thierry Ponchon; Paul Fockens; Axel Dignass; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 4.  Quality indicators in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Wladyslaw Januszewicz; Michal F Kaminski
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in the Endoscopic Assessment of Premalignant and Malignant Esophageal Lesions: Present and Future.

Authors:  Daniela Cornelia Lazăr; Mihaela Flavia Avram; Alexandra Corina Faur; Adrian Goldiş; Ioan Romoşan; Sorina Tăban; Mărioara Cornianu
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  A short telephone-call reminder improves bowel preparation, quality indicators and patient satisfaction with first colonoscopy.

Authors:  Marisol Gálvez; Angel Mario Zarate; Hector Espino; Fátima Higuera-de la Tijera; Richard Alexander Awad; Santiago Camacho
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-11-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.