Literature DB >> 24500977

A novel colonoscopy reporting system enabling quality assurance.

Sascha C van Doorn1, Joost van Vliet2, Paul Fockens1, Evelien Dekker1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The quality of colonoscopy can only be measured if colonoscopy reports include all key quality indicators. In daily practice, reporting is often incomplete and not standardized. This study describes a novel, structured colonoscopy reporting system, which aims to generate standardized and complete reports and to facilitate the automatic analysis of colonoscopy quality indicators.
METHODS: A new colonoscopy reporting system (EndoALPHA) was developed. The system reports all colonoscopy quality indicators, as well as pathological findings, in a systematic manner using structured terminology. All essential items carry specific codes, which enables statistical analysis and the automatic generation of reports of all quality indicators. The EndoALPHA reporting system was tested with regard to completeness of reporting and evaluation of quality indicators both for individual endoscopists and the endoscopy unit.
RESULTS: In 2012, all 810 colonoscopies performed at one colonoscopy center were documented using EndoALPHA. Overall, 94 % of performed colonoscopies were reported completely using the encoded terminology. Individual unadjusted cecal intubation rates were above 90 % for all endoscopists (mean 96.7 %), and the adenoma detection rate was above 20 % for all endoscopists (35.4 % for the unit).
CONCLUSION: The novel EndoALPHA reporting system enables automatic quality assessment on two levels: the completeness of reporting can be evaluated, and if this is adequate, the quality of the colonoscopies can also be assessed. Integrated with feedback, benchmarking and training, the reporting system may facilitate quality improvement for colonoscopy services. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24500977     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1364877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  11 in total

Review 1.  Reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy position statement.

Authors:  Michael Bretthauer; Lars Aabakken; Evelien Dekker; Michal F Kaminski; Thomas Rösch; Rolf Hultcrantz; Stepan Suchanek; Rodrigo Jover; Ernst J Kuipers; Raf Bisschops; Cristiano Spada; Roland Valori; Dirk Domagk; Colin Rees; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 2.  Quality Indicators in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Kjetil Garborg; Thomas de Lange; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09

Review 3.  Colorectal Cancer Screening in Asia.

Authors:  Han-Mo Chiu; Wen-Feng Hsu; Li-Chun Chang; Ming-Hsiang Wu
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2017-08-10

4.  Simple colonoscopy reporting system checking the detection rate of colon polyps.

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Youn Jung Choi; Hye Jung Kwon; Seun Ja Park; Moo In Park; Won Moon; Sung Eun Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Difficult colonoscopy score identifies the difficult patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy.

Authors:  Hui Jia; Limei Wang; Hui Luo; Shaowei Yao; Xiangping Wang; Linhui Zhang; Rui Huang; Zhiguo Liu; Xiaoyu Kang; Yanglin Pan; Xuegang Guo
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Polypectomy skills of gastroenterology fellows: can we improve them?

Authors:  Sascha C van Doorn; Barbara A J Bastiaansen; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-01-08

7.  A wide variation of the quality of colonoscopy reporting system in the real clinical practice in southeastern area of Korea.

Authors:  Jung Min Lee; Yu Jin Kang; Eun Soo Kim; Yoo Jin Lee; Kyung Sik Park; Kwang Bum Cho; Seong Woo Jeon; Min Kyu Jung; Hyun Seok Lee; Eun Young Kim; Jin Tae Jung; Byung Ik Jang; Kyeong Ok Kim; Yun Jin Chung; Chang Hun Yang
Journal:  Intest Res       Date:  2016-10-17

Review 8.  Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Roisin Bevan; Katharina Zimmermann-Fraedrich; Matthew D Rutter; Douglas Rex; Evelien Dekker; Thierry Ponchon; Michael Bretthauer; Jaroslaw Regula; Brian Saunders; Cesare Hassan; Michael J Bourke; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Standards of diagnostic colonoscopy for early-stage neoplasia: Recommendations by an Asian private group.

Authors:  Yasushi Sano; Han-Mo Chiu; Xiao-Bo Li; Supakij Khomvilai; Pises Pisespongsa; Jonard Tan Co; Takuji Kawamura; Nozomu Kobayashi; Shinji Tanaka; David G Hewett; Yoji Takeuchi; Kenichiro Imai; Takahiro Utsumi; Akira Teramoto; Daizen Hirata; Mineo Iwatate; Rajvinder Singh; Siew C Ng; Shiaw-Hooi Ho; Philip Chiu; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 7.559

10.  The Quality of Colonoscopy Reporting in Usual Practice: Are Endoscopists Reporting Key Data Elements?

Authors:  S D Hadlock; N Liu; M Bernstein; M Gould; L Rabeneck; A Ruco; R Sutradhar; J M Tinmouth
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.