Literature DB >> 19658021

Quality assurance as an integrated part of the electronic medical record - a prototype applied for colonoscopy.

Geir Hoff1, Per Marcus Ottestad, Stein Roger Skafløtten, Michael Bretthauer, Volker Moritz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Electronic medical records (EMRs) have not developed much beyond the days of typewritten journals when it comes to facilitating extraction of data for quality assurance (QA) and improvement of health-care performance.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on 5 years' experience from the Norwegian Gastronet QA programme, we have developed a highly QA-profiled EMR for colonoscopy. We used a three-tier solution (client, server and database) written in the Java programming language using a number of open-source libraries. QA principles from the Norwegian paper-based Gastronet QA programme formed the basis for development of the ColoReg software. ColoReg is developed primarily for colonoscopy reporting in a screening trial, but may be used in routine clinical work. The QA module in ColoReg is well suited for intervention towards suboptimal performance in both settings.
RESULTS: We have developed user-friendly software dominated by clickable boxes and curtain menus reducing free text to a minimum. The software gives warnings when illogical registrations are entered and reasons have to be given for divergence from software recommendations for work-up and surveillance. At any time, defined performance quality parameters are readily accessible in tabular form with the named, logged-in endoscopist being compared with all other anonymized endoscopists in the database.
CONCLUSION: The ColoReg software is developed for use in an international, multicentre trial on colonoscopy screening. It is user-friendly and secures continuous QA of the endoscopist's performance. The principles used are applicable to development of EMRs in general.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19658021     DOI: 10.1080/00365520903132021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  5 in total

1.  The NordICC Study: rationale and design of a randomized trial on colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M F Kaminski; M Bretthauer; A G Zauber; E J Kuipers; H-O Adami; M van Ballegooijen; J Regula; M van Leerdam; T Stefansson; L Påhlman; E Dekker; M A Hernán; K Garborg; G Hoff
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Identifying patients with hypertension: a case for auditing electronic health record data.

Authors:  Adam Baus; Michael Hendryx; Cecil Pollard
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-04-01

Review 3.  Reporting systems in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Requirements and standards facilitating quality improvement: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy position statement.

Authors:  Michael Bretthauer; Lars Aabakken; Evelien Dekker; Michal F Kaminski; Thomas Rösch; Rolf Hultcrantz; Stepan Suchanek; Rodrigo Jover; Ernst J Kuipers; Raf Bisschops; Cristiano Spada; Roland Valori; Dirk Domagk; Colin Rees; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 4.  Intracerebral hemorrhage specific intensity of care quality metrics.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 5.  Endoscopy reporting standards.

Authors:  Daphnée Beaulieu; Alan N Barkun; Catherine Dubé; Jill Tinmouth; Pierre Hallé; Myriam Martel
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.522

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.