Literature DB >> 36147733

Selective inference for effect modification via the lasso.

Qingyuan Zhao1, Dylan S Small2, Ashkan Ertefaie3.   

Abstract

Effect modification occurs when the effect of the treatment on an outcome varies according to the level of other covariates and often has important implications in decision-making. When there are tens or hundreds of covariates, it becomes necessary to use the observed data to select a simpler model for effect modification and then make valid statistical inference. We propose a two-stage procedure to solve this problem. First, we use Robinson's transformation to decouple the nuisance parameters from the treatment effect of interest and use machine learning algorithms to estimate the nuisance parameters. Next, after plugging in the estimates of the nuisance parameters, we use the lasso to choose a low-complexity model for effect modification. Compared to a full model consisting of all the covariates, the selected model is much more interpretable. Compared to the univariate subgroup analyses, the selected model greatly reduces the number of false discoveries. We show that the conditional selective inference for the selected model is asymptotically valid given the rate assumptions in classical semiparametric regression. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to verify the asymptotic results and an epidemiological application is used to demonstrate the method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  causal inference; false coverage rate; machine learning; post-selection inference; semiparametric regression

Year:  2021        PMID: 36147733      PMCID: PMC9491375          DOI: 10.1111/rssb.12483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol        ISSN: 1369-7412            Impact factor:   4.933


  19 in total

1.  Statistics in medicine--reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Stephen W Lagakos; James H Ware; David J Hunter; Jeffrey M Drazen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance.

Authors:  J W TUKEY
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1949-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The precision medicine initiative: a new national effort.

Authors:  Euan A Ashley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Genome-Scale Signatures of Gene Interaction from Compound Screens Predict Clinical Efficacy of Targeted Cancer Therapies.

Authors:  Peng Jiang; Winston Lee; Xujuan Li; Carl Johnson; Jun S Liu; Myles Brown; Jon Christopher Aster; X Shirley Liu
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 10.304

5.  Targeted estimation and inference for the sample average treatment effect in trials with and without pair-matching.

Authors:  Laura B Balzer; Maya L Petersen; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Eric B Laber; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Long-term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss.

Authors:  Priya Sumithran; Luke A Prendergast; Elizabeth Delbridge; Katrina Purcell; Arthur Shulkes; Adamandia Kriketos; Joseph Proietto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

9.  Super-Learning of an Optimal Dynamic Treatment Rule.

Authors:  Alexander R Luedtke; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 0.968

10.  Towards precision medicine for sepsis patients.

Authors:  Peter Pickkers; Matthijs Kox
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.