Literature DB >> 27087400

Impact of a prior cesarean delivery on embryo transfer: a prospective study.

George Patounakis1, Meghan C Ozcan2, Rebecca J Chason2, John M Norian3, Mark Payson4, Alan H DeCherney1, Belinda J Yauger5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a history of prior cesarean delivery (CD) makes ET more difficult and impacts pregnancy outcomes.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Tertiary care military facility. PATIENT(S): One hundred ninety-four patients with previous delivery undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-ET. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth (primary), positive hCG, clinical pregnancy, and time to perform ET. RESULT(S): There was no statistically significant difference between patients with a history of only vaginal deliveries versus those with a history of CD for live birth (39% vs. 32%), positive hCG (56% vs. 53%), or clinical pregnancy (49% vs. 41%). Embryo transfers took longer in the history of CD group (157 vs. 187 seconds) and were more likely to have mucus (27% vs. 45%) or blood (8% vs. 21%) on the catheter. CONCLUSION(S): Embryo transfers performed on patients with a prior CD took 30 seconds longer. They were also more likely to have blood or mucus on the catheter. Despite the apparently more difficult transfers, pregnancy outcomes were not different between the two groups. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryo transfer; IVF; cesarean delivery; cesarean scar

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27087400      PMCID: PMC4975618          DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  22 in total

1.  The degree of difficulty of embryo transfer is an independent factor for predicting pregnancy.

Authors:  Candido Tomás; Kimmo Tikkinen; Leena Tuomivaara; Juha S Tapanainen; Hannu Martikainen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  The impact of cesarean birth on subsequent fertility.

Authors:  Engin Oral; Koray Elter
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 3.  Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications.

Authors:  Amanda M Tower; Gary N Frishman
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Endometrial fluid visualized through ultrasonography during ovarian stimulation in IVF cycles impairs the outcome in tubal factor, but not PCOS, patients.

Authors:  Mehmet Ali Akman; Halit Firat Erden; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound.

Authors:  Vanessa Armstrong; Wendy F Hansen; Bradley J Van Voorhis; Craig H Syrop
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 6.  Maternal body mass index and the risk of fetal death, stillbirth, and infant death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dagfinn Aune; Ola Didrik Saugstad; Tore Henriksen; Serena Tonstad
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography.

Authors:  C Regnard; M Nosbusch; C Fellemans; N Benali; M van Rysselberghe; P Barlow; S Rozenberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.299

8.  Embryo transfer by reproductive endocrinology fellows vs attending physicians: are live birth rates comparable?

Authors:  Jennifer L Eaton; Xingqi Zhang; Randall B Barnes
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Microdose follicular flare: a viable alternative for normal-responding patients undergoing in vitro fertilization?

Authors:  Eric D Levens; Brian W Whitcomb; Jonathan D Kort; Donna Materia-Hoover; Frederick W Larsen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop.

Authors:  Catherine Y Spong; Vincenzo Berghella; Katharine D Wenstrom; Brian M Mercer; George R Saade
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reproductive outcomes in women with prior cesarean section undergoing in vitro fertilization: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Ya-Qin Wang; Tai-Lang Yin; Wang-Min Xu; Qian-Rong Qi; Xiao-Chen Wang; Jing Yang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-21

2.  Comparative Study of USG and MRI in Evaluation of Isthmocele.

Authors:  Taru Gupta; Khushbu Singal; Nupur Gupta; Supreeti Kohli; Monica Kanyal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-02-17

3.  Pregnancy and Perinatal Outcomes of Patients With Prior Cesarean Section After a Single Embryo Transfer in IVF/ICSI: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Jing Wang; Nan Lu; Jiayin Liu; Feiyang Diao
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 6.055

4.  Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms.

Authors:  Jolijn Vissers; Wouter Hehenkamp; Cornelis Bavo Lambalk; Judith Anna Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Bacterial colonization at caesarean section defects in women of secondary infertility: an observational study.

Authors:  Isabel Hsu; Leonard Hsu; Sonam Dorjee; Chao-Chin Hsu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Reduced pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization in women with previous Caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Vissers; T C Sluckin; C C Repelaer van Driel-Delprat; R Schats; C J M Groot; C B Lambalk; J W R Twisk; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Identifying possible risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy based on a retrospective study of 291 cases.

Authors:  XianYi Zhou; Hua Li; XiaoDong Fu
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 1.730

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.