Literature DB >> 34408349

Comparative Study of USG and MRI in Evaluation of Isthmocele.

Taru Gupta1, Khushbu Singal1, Nupur Gupta1, Supreeti Kohli2, Monica Kanyal1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the presence of isthmocele in post-cesarean women using USG and MRI and its correlation with risk factors.
METHOD: This was a prospective observational study. A total of 90 patients were enrolled at the time of discharge of cesarean delivery and were advised to come for follow-up at 3-4 months for detection of isthmocele. A total of 82 patients reported for follow-up, and TVS and MRI Pelvis were done for visualization of isthmocele. If isthmocele was diagnosed, its correlation with risk factors was studied.
RESULTS: On TVS isthmocele was present in 11 patients and on MRI in 16 patients. Detection rate was 77.07% in comparison with previous studies. Compared to MRI, sensitivity of USG was 68.75%; however, the specificity and positive predictive value for both were 100%. The negative predictive value for USG compared to MRI was 92.96%. Shape of the isthmocele was triangular in most women. Obesity, prior history of cesarean delivery, elective cesarean, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia and prolonged active labor were associated with development of isthmocele.
CONCLUSION: The study concluded that yield of diagnosis of isthmocele by MRI was better than TVS but not statistically significant. Further study with large sample size is needed to identify the best tool for diagnosis of isthmocele. Obesity, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, prior history of cesarean, elective cesarean and prolonged active labor were associated with development of isthmocele. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean scar defect; Isthmocele; Magnetic resonance imaging; Ultrasonography

Year:  2021        PMID: 34408349      PMCID: PMC8310802          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-021-01433-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  14 in total

Review 1.  Isthmocele: an overview of diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Thaysa Guglieri Kremer; Isadora Bueloni Ghiorzi; Raquel Papandreus Dibi
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 1.209

2.  Changes in the Uterine Scar during the First Year after a Caesarean Section: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Lucy F van der Voet; Inge P M Jordans; Hans A M Brölmann; Sebastiaan Veersema; Judith A F Huirne
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 3.  Role of growth factors and biomaterials in wound healing.

Authors:  Farshad Zarei; Maryam Soleimaninejad
Journal:  Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.678

4.  Impact of a prior cesarean delivery on embryo transfer: a prospective study.

Authors:  George Patounakis; Meghan C Ozcan; Rebecca J Chason; John M Norian; Mark Payson; Alan H DeCherney; Belinda J Yauger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Cesarean scar defect: a prospective study on risk factors.

Authors:  Riitta M Antila-Långsjö; Johanna U Mäenpää; Heini S Huhtala; Eija I Tomás; Synnöve M Staff
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  Cesarean scar pregnancy - a new challenge for obstetricians.

Authors:  Piotr Pędraszewski; Edyta Wlaźlak; Wojciech Panek; Grzegorz Surkont
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2018-03-30

7.  Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L B Uittenbogaard; W J K Hehenkamp; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Jianfeng Ye; Anne-Beth Moller; Jun Zhang; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Cesarean Scar Defect.

Authors:  Wu Shun Felix Wong; Wing Tak Fung
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2018-08-23

Review 10.  Imaging findings of cesarean delivery complications: cesarean scar disease and much more.

Authors:  F Rosa; G Perugin; D Schettini; N Romano; S Romeo; R Podestà; A Guastavino; A Casaleggio; N Gandolfo
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.