Literature DB >> 15027020

Cesarean section scar evaluation by saline contrast sonohysterography.

C Regnard1, M Nosbusch, C Fellemans, N Benali, M van Rysselberghe, P Barlow, S Rozenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of images suggesting the existence of a dehiscence at the site of the uterine scar after Cesarean section.
METHODS: Thirty-three women with a past history of Cesarean section who were planning a further pregnancy were involved in the study. Saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) was performed a minimum of 3 months following Cesarean section. The thickness of the residual myometrium, the thickness of the myometrium bordering the scar and the depth of the filling defect in the scar (i.e. the 'niche', defined as a triangular, anechoic area at the presumed site of incision) were recorded in each case. A 'dehiscence' was defined as a niche whose depth was at least 80% of the anterior myometrium.
RESULTS: In 19/33 (57.5%) patients a niche with a depth of 4.2 +/- 2.5 (range, 1.2-11.7) mm was identified. In these patients the residual myometrium measured 6.5 +/- 2.7 (range, 0-10.9) mm vs. 8.9 +/- 2.0 (range, 6.9-13.9) mm in the remaining 14 patients without a niche. Within the 19 niches, two dehiscences were identified.
CONCLUSION: Niches can be identified by SCSH following a Cesarean section in about 60% of patients. The prevalence of scar dehiscence (in the present series 2/33 or 6%) is much higher than the reported risk of uterine rupture (0.4%). Copyright 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15027020     DOI: 10.1002/uog.999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  19 in total

1.  Balloon fluoroscopy as treatment for intrauterine adhesions: a novel approach.

Authors:  Rebecca J Chason; Eric D Levens; Belinda J Yauger; Mark D Payson; Kenneth Cho; Frederick W Larsen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Impact of a prior cesarean delivery on embryo transfer: a prospective study.

Authors:  George Patounakis; Meghan C Ozcan; Rebecca J Chason; John M Norian; Mark Payson; Alan H DeCherney; Belinda J Yauger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Complications of Caesarean delivery part 2: Non-pregnant and pregnancy-related complications.

Authors:  Eelin Tan; Timothy Shao Ern Tan; Harvey Eu Leong Teo; Li Ching Lau
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2021-08-27

4.  Pregnancy Outcomes of Different Endometrial Preparation in Patients With a History of Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Run Xin Gan; Yuan Li; Juan Song; Quan Wen; Guang Xiu Lu; Ge Lin; Fei Gong
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.055

5.  Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of uterine scar after previous caesarean section: comparison with 3T-magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Federica Fiocchi; Elisabetta Petrella; Luca Nocetti; Serena Currà; Guido Ligabue; Tiziana Costi; Pietro Torricelli; Fabio Facchinetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Changes in uterine flexion caused by cesarean section: correlation between post-flexion and deficient cesarean section scars.

Authors:  Eiji Ryo; Rina Sakurai; Hideo Kamata; Michiharu Seto; Masayoshi Morita; Takuya Ayabe
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 1.314

7.  Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.

Authors:  Xingchen Zhou; Tao Zhang; Huayuan Qiao; Yi Zhang; Xipeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Successful management of a cesarean scar defect with dehiscence of the uterine incision by using wound lavage.

Authors:  Akinori Ida; Yoko Kubota; Maiko Nosaka; Koichi Ito; Hiroshi Kato; Yoshiyuki Tsuji
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-11-06

9.  The HysNiche trial: hysteroscopic resection of uterine caesarean scar defect (niche) in patients with abnormal bleeding, a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L F Van der Voet; M Witmer; A L Thurkow; C M Radder; P J M van Kesteren; H W P Quartero; W K H Kuchenbecker; M Y Bongers; P M A J Geomini; L H M de Vleeschouwer; M H A van Hooff; H A A M van Vliet; S Veersema; W B Renes; H S van Meurs; J Bosmans; K Oude Rengerink; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Uterine closure with unlocked suture in cesarean section: Safety and Quality.

Authors:  Guluzar Arzu Turan; Esra Bahar Gur; Sumeyra Tatar; Ayse Gokduman; Serkan Guclu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.088

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.