Literature DB >> 27086502

Current Standard Technique for Modern Flexible Ureteroscopy: Tips and Tricks.

Guido Giusti1, Silvia Proietti2, Luca Villa3, Jonathan Cloutier4, Marco Rosso5, Giulio Maria Gadda5, Steeve Doizi4, Nazareno Suardi5, Francesco Montorsi6, Franco Gaboardi5, Olivier Traxer4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thanks to advancements in the endoscopic armamentarium, flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) has become a viable and attractive option for the treatment of renal stones because of its high stone-free rates (SFRs) and low morbidity.
OBJECTIVE: To describe our surgical technique for fURS, step-by-step, for the treatment of renal stones and to assess its effectiveness and safety. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis of 316 consecutive patients who underwent fURS for renal stones at our institution between March 2014 and September 2015 was performed. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy using a standardized technique with last-generation flexible ureteroscopes. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Clinical data were collected in a dedicated database. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were assessed. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The mean overall stone size was 16.5 ± 7.9mm. Ureteral access sheath placement was possible in 287 patients (90.8%). At 1-mo follow-up, the overall primary SFR was 79.1%; the secondary and tertiary SFRs were 89.5% and 91.5%, respectively. The mean operative time was 72.6 ± 27.5min. The mean number of procedures was 1.27. Complications were reported in 92 patients (29.1%) overall, with Clavien grade 1 in 55 patients (17.4%), grade 2 in 30 patients (9.5%), grade 3 in 6 patients (1.9%), grade 4 in 1 patient (0.3%), and grade 5 in none. The main limitation of the study was the retrospective nature.
CONCLUSIONS: The fURS procedure is safe and effective for the treatment of renal stones. A staged procedure is necessary to achieve stone-free status with large calculi. PATIENT
SUMMARY: Flexible ureteroscopy is an effective treatment with low complication rates for the majority of renal stones. Both the modern highly technological armamentarium and surgical know-how should be available.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Flexible ureteroscopy; Renal stones; Stone-free rate; Surgical technique; Tips and tricks

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27086502     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  29 in total

1.  Optimizing RNA Extraction of Renal Papilla Biopsy Tissue in Kidney Stone Formers: A New Methodology for Genomic Study.

Authors:  Kazumi Taguchi; Manint Usawachintachit; Shuzo Hamamoto; Rei Unno; David T Tzou; Benjamin A Sherer; Yongmei Wang; Atsushi Okada; Marshall L Stoller; Takahiro Yasui; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Which flexible ureteroscope is the best for upper tract urothelial carcinoma treatment?

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Steeve Doizi; Luca Villa; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Impact of laser fiber tip cleavage on power output for ureteroscopy and stone treatment.

Authors:  M Haddad; E Emiliani; Y Rouchausse; F Coste; L Berthe; S Doizi; S Buttice; B Somani; O Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Handling and protecting your flexible ureteroscope: how to maximise scope usage.

Authors:  Khaled Hosny; Jennifer Clark; Shalom J Srirangam
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-09

Review 5.  Flexible ureteroscopy: technique, tips and tricks.

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Gap between UAS and ureteroscope predicts renal stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopy with the fragmentation technique.

Authors:  Mitsuru Komeya; Hisakazu Odaka; Takahiko Watanabe; Hirokazu Kiuchi; Takehiko Ogawa; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Reperfusion and Compartment Syndrome After Flexible Ureteroscopy in a Patient with an Iliac Vascular Graft.

Authors:  Esteban Emiliani; Michele Talso; Edgar Beltrán-Suárez; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol Case Rep       Date:  2016-11-01

8.  Prospective Single-Center Study of SuperPulsed Thulium Fiber Laser in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Initial Clinical Data.

Authors:  Mark Taratkin; Camilla Azilgareeva; Dmitry Korolev; Yazeed Barghouthy; Dmitry Tsarichenko; Gagik Akopyan; Denis Chinenov; Stanislav Ali; Vasiliy Kozlov; Vasiliy Mikhailov; Dmitry Enikeev
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.934

9.  Is retrograde intrarenal surgery the game changer in the management of upper tract calculi? A single-center single-surgeon experience of 131 cases.

Authors:  Kandarp Priyakant Parikh; Ravi Jineshkumar Jain; Aditya Parikh Kandarp
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

10.  Spinal versus general anesthesia during retrograde intra-renal surgery: A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Olivero; Lorenzo Ball; Carlotta Fontaneto; Guglielmo Mantica; Paolo Bottino; Paolo Pelosi; Carlo Terrone
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.