Literature DB >> 34134117

Prospective Single-Center Study of SuperPulsed Thulium Fiber Laser in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Initial Clinical Data.

Mark Taratkin1, Camilla Azilgareeva2, Dmitry Korolev1, Yazeed Barghouthy3, Dmitry Tsarichenko1, Gagik Akopyan1, Denis Chinenov1, Stanislav Ali1, Vasiliy Kozlov4, Vasiliy Mikhailov1, Dmitry Enikeev1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to present our clinical experience of using the thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).
METHODS: A prospective clinical study performed after the IRB approval (Sechenov University, Russia). Patients with stones <30 mm were treated with SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser (SP TFL) (NTO IRE-Polus, Russia) through a 200-μm-diameter fiber. Stone size, density, the duration of the operation, and laser on time (LOT) were measured. Based on the surgeon's feedback, retropulsion and intraoperative visibility were also assessed (Likert scale). Stone-free rates (SFRs) were assessed with a low-dose CT scan 90 days after the operation.
RESULTS: Between January 2018 and December 2019, 153 patients (mean age 54 ± 2.8 years) underwent RIRS with SP TFL (mean stone density 1,020 ± 382 HU). Median stone volume was 279.6 (139.4-615.8) mm3. Median LOT was 2.8 (IQR 1.6-6.6) min with median total energy for stone ablation 4.0 (IQR 2.1-7.17) kJ, median ablation speed was 1.7 (1.0-2.8) mm3/s, median ablation efficacy was 13.3 (7.3-20.9) J/mm3, and energy consumption was 170.3 (59.7-743.3) J/s. Overall, the SFR (at 3 months) was 89%. The overall complication rate was 8.4%. Retropulsion was present in 23 (15.1%) patients. Visibility was estimated as optimal in most patients, with poor visibility reported in only 13 (8.5%) patients.
CONCLUSION: The SP TFL is a safe and efficient tool in lithotripsy, irrespective of the stone type and density. Retropulsion is minimal and visibility is maintained with SP TFL. Nonetheless, further clinical studies are needed to ensure optimal comparison with conventional holmium:YAG lithotripsy.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Thulium fiber laser; Urinary stones; Urolithiasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34134117      PMCID: PMC9153347          DOI: 10.1159/000516933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   1.934


  23 in total

1.  Sensitivity of Noncontrast Computed Tomography for Small Renal Calculi With Endoscopy as the Gold Standard.

Authors:  Naeem Bhojani; Jessica E Paonessa; Marawan M El Tayeb; James C Williams; Tariq A Hameed; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Dusting technique for lithotripsy: what does it mean?

Authors:  Steeve Doizi; Etienne Xavier Keller; Vincent De Coninck; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Prospective Evaluation of Bilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Is It Really Safe?

Authors:  Alexandre Danilovic; Fabio Cesar Miranda Torricelli; Giovanni Scala Marchini; Carlos Batagello; Fabio Carvalho Vicentini; Olivier Traxer; Miguel Srougi; William C Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  A prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stones.

Authors:  G Bozzini; P Verze; D Arcaniolo; O Dal Piaz; N M Buffi; G Guazzoni; M Provenzano; B Osmolorskij; F Sanguedolce; E Montanari; N Macchione; K Pummer; V Mirone; M De Sio; G Taverna
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  How Lasers Ablate Stones: In Vitro Study of Laser Lithotripsy (Ho:YAG and Tm-Fiber Lasers) in Different Environments.

Authors:  Mark Taratkin; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Nirmish Singla; Alexander Tarasov; Tatyana Alekseeva; Mikhail Enikeev; Dmitry Enikeev
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 6.  The changing role of lasers in urologic surgery.

Authors:  Dmitry Enikeev; Shahrokh F Shariat; Mark Taratkin; Petr Glybochko
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 7.  Burden of Urolithiasis: Trends in Prevalence, Treatments, and Costs.

Authors:  Omer A Raheem; Yash S Khandwala; Roger L Sur; Khurshid R Ghani; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-04-24

8.  High power holmium:YAG versus thulium fiber laser treatment of kidney stones in dusting mode: ablation rate and fragment size studies.

Authors:  Luke A Hardy; Viktoriya Vinnichenko; Nathaniel M Fried
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Novel Thulium Fiber Laser for Enucleation of Prostate: A Retrospective Comparison with Open Simple Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Dmitry Enikeev; Zhamshid Okhunov; Leonid Rapoport; Mark Taratkin; Mikhail Enikeev; Olesya Snurnitsyna; Taylor Capretz; Jasur Inoyatov; Petr Glybochko
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Is it necessary to actively remove stone fragments during retrograde intrarenal surgery?

Authors:  You Jin Lee; Dong Jae Bak; Jae-Wook Chung; Jun Nyung Lee; Hyun Tae Kim; Eun Sang Yoo; Bum Soo Kim
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-07-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  The clinical efficiency and safety of 60W superpulse thulium fiber laser in retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Chandra Mohan Vaddi; Paidakula Ramakrishna; Soundarya Ganeshan; Siddalinga Swamy; Hemnath Anandan; Manas Babu; Rakesh Panda
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2022-07-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.