Literature DB >> 32986134

Gap between UAS and ureteroscope predicts renal stone-free rate after flexible ureteroscopy with the fragmentation technique.

Mitsuru Komeya1,2, Hisakazu Odaka3, Takahiko Watanabe3, Hirokazu Kiuchi3, Takehiko Ogawa4, Masahiro Yao4, Junichi Matsuzaki3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of our new classification on surgical outcomes after flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for kidney stones.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined 128 patients after single renal fURS procedures performed using ureteral access sheaths (UASs) with the fragmentation technique. Based on the gap (calculated by subtracting the ureteroscope diameter from the UAS diameter), enrolled patients were divided into three groups: small (< 0.6 mm), medium (0.6 to < 1.2 mm), and large space groups (≥ 1.2 mm). Stone-free (SF) status was defined as either complete absence of stones (SF) or the presence of stones < 4 mm in diameter on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT).
RESULTS: The SF rate was significantly lower in the small space group (50% in small, 97.9% in medium, 89.2% in large; p = 0.001). Perioperative complications over Clavien-Dindo Grade I were observed in 16.7%, 4.2%, and 8.1% of patients, respectively (p = 0.452). The ratio of stone volume and operative time (efficiency of stone removal) was significantly higher in the large space group compared to the small and medium space groups (0.009 ± 0.003 ml/min, 0.013 ± 0.005 ml/min, 0.027 ± 0.012 ml/min, respectively; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our findings that gaps > 0.6 mm (1.8 Fr), including the combination of a 9.5-Fr UAS and a small caliber ureteroscope, improve SF rates, and larger gaps facilitate stone removal efficiency providing the basis for future development of clinical protocols aimed at improving outcomes.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney calculi; Postoperative complications; Stone-free rate; Ureteral access sheath; Ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32986134     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03459-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  14 in total

Review 1.  Benefits and risks of ureteral access sheaths for retrograde renal access.

Authors:  Alberto Breda; Angelo Territo; Juan Manuel López-Martínez
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.

Authors:  Ahmed R El-Nahas; Hamdy M Ibrahim; Ramy F Youssef; Khaled Z Sheir
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Current Standard Technique for Modern Flexible Ureteroscopy: Tips and Tricks.

Authors:  Guido Giusti; Silvia Proietti; Luca Villa; Jonathan Cloutier; Marco Rosso; Giulio Maria Gadda; Steeve Doizi; Nazareno Suardi; Francesco Montorsi; Franco Gaboardi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Burden of Urolithiasis: Trends in Prevalence, Treatments, and Costs.

Authors:  Omer A Raheem; Yash S Khandwala; Roger L Sur; Khurshid R Ghani; John D Denstedt
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2017-04-24

5.  Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater--is this the new frontier?

Authors:  Alberto Breda; Oreoluwa Ogunyemi; John T Leppert; John S Lam; Peter G Schulam
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Impact of tumour morphology on renal function decline after partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Reza Mehrazin; Kerrin L Palazzi; Ryan P Kopp; Caroline J Colangelo; Sean P Stroup; James H Masterson; Michael A Liss; Seth A Cohen; Ramzi Jabaji; Samuel K Park; Anthony L Patterson; James O L'Esperance; Ithaar H Derweesh
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones.

Authors:  Alberto Breda; Oreoluwa Ogunyemi; John T Leppert; Peter G Schulam
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Outcome of flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone with overnight ureteral catheterization: a propensity score-matching analysis.

Authors:  Mitsuru Komeya; Kimitsugu Usui; Takuo Asai; Takehiko Ogawa; Masataka Taguri; Koshi Kataoka; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Development and internal validation of a nomogram to predict perioperative complications after flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones in overnight ureteral catheterization cases.

Authors:  Mitsuru Komeya; Hisakazu Odaka; Jun Asano; Takuo Asai; Yusuke Saigusa; Takehiko Ogawa; Masahiro Yao; Junichi Matsuzaki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study.

Authors:  Olivier Traxer; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Hiren Sodha; Jens Rassweiler; Shimon Meretyk; Ahmet Tefekli; Fernando Coz; Jean J de la Rosette
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  2 in total

1.  The use of 14/16Fr ureter access sheath for safe and effective management of large upper ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Arman Tsaturyan; George Kalogeropoulos; Marco Lattarulo; Constantinos Adamou; Konstantinos Pagonis; Angelis Peteinaris; Despoina Liourdi; Theofanis Vrettos; Evangelos Liatsikos; Panagiotis Kallidonis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Ureteral Access Sheaths and Its Use in the Future: A Comprehensive Update Based on a Literature Review.

Authors:  Vincent De Coninck; Bhaskar Somani; Emre Tarik Sener; Esteban Emiliani; Mariela Corrales; Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Amelia Pietropaolo; Ioannis Mykoniatis; Belthangady M Zeeshan Hameed; Francesco Esperto; Silvia Proietti; Olivier Traxer; Etienne Xavier Keller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.