| Literature DB >> 27081040 |
Yingying Xie1,2, Lechuang Chen3, Xiaolei Lv4, Guixue Hou1,2, Yang Wang1,2, Cuicui Jiang4, Hongxia Zhu3, Ningzhi Xu3, Lin Wu1,2, Xiaomin Lou1,2, Siqi Liu1,2,4,5.
Abstract
The proteins in tissue interstitial fluids (TIFs) can spread into the blood and have been proposed as an ideal material to find blood biomarkers. The colon TIFs were collected from 8-, 13-, 18-, and 22-week ApcMin/+, a typical mouse model of colorectal cancer (CRC), and wild-type mice. iTRAQ-based quantification proteomics was conducted to survey the TIF proteins whose abundance appeared to depend on tumor progression. A total of 46 proteins that exhibited consecutive changes in abundance were identified, including six serine proteases, chymotrypsin-like elastase 1 (CELA1), chymotrypsin-like elastase 2A (CEL2A), chymopasin, chymotrypsinogen B (CTRB1), trypsin 2 (TRY2), and trypsin 4 (TRY4). The observed increases in the abundance of serine proteases were supported in another quantitative evaluation of the individual colon TIFs using a multiple reaction monitor (MRM) assay. Importantly, the increases in the abundance of serine proteases were also verified in the corresponding sera. The quantitative verification of the serine proteases was further extended to the clinical sera, revealing significantly higher levels of CELA1, CEL2A, CTRL/chymopasin, and TRY2 in CRC patients. The receiver operating characteristic analysis illustrated that the combination of CELA1 and CTRL reached the best diagnostic performance, with 90.0% sensitivity and 80.0% specificity. Thus, the quantitative target analysis demonstrated that some serine proteases are indicative of CRC progression.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; colorectal cancer; serine proteases; serum; tissue interstitial fluid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27081040 PMCID: PMC5078036 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8693
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Characteristics of colorectal tumor development in the ApcMin/+ mouse model
A-B. The average number of tumors (A) and tumor size (B) at each time point. The number of mice (N) and tumors (n) are indicated. Bars, mean with SE. C. H&E staining of colon tissues from ApcMin/+ and WT mice.
Figure 2The experimental workflow for CRC biomarker discovery and verification
Figure 3iTRAQ proteomic analysis of TIF proteins
A. Secretory characteristics of 1174 colon TIF proteins. Classical and non-classical secretory proteins were predicted by SignalP 4.1 and SecretomeP 2.0. Known mouse serum proteins were reported in published papers [22, 23]. B. The number of differential proteins defined by comparing ApcMin/+ mice with age-matched WT mice. C. Heat map illustrating the change patterns (consecutive increase, consecutive decrease and irregular change) of 120 differential proteins. The enlarged region shows the consecutive increases in six serine proteases. D. The changes in the relative levels of the six serine proteases in ApcMin/+ mice. The level of each protein at 8 weeks was used as the reference.
Figure 4The relative protein levels of the six serine proteases in individual TIF (A) and serum (B) samples from ApcMin/+ mice (n=6/time point) measured using MRM
The protein peak areas of one 13-week-old mouse and one 8-week-old mouse were used as the references for the TIF and serum samples, respectively. * p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01, *** p≤0.001 (Mann-Whitney U test). Bars, median with interquartile range.
Clinical characteristics of CRC patients and healthy controls for MRM detection
| Characteristics | Colon cancer group (N=30) n (%) | Control group (N=30) n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 18 (60.0%) | 17 (56.7%) |
| Female | 12 (40.0%) | 13 (43.3%) |
| Age | ||
| 31-40 | 5 (16.7%) | 5 (16.7%) |
| 41-50 | 9 (30.0%) | 9 (30.0%) |
| 51-60 | 9 (30.0%) | 10 (33.3%) |
| 61-70 | 7 (23.3%) | 6 (20.0%) |
| Tumor size (cm) | ||
| 2-4 | 9 (30.0%) | |
| 4-6 | 13 (43.3%) | |
| 6-8 | 8 (26.7%) | |
| Depth of invasion | ||
| T1 | 0 | |
| T2 | 4 (13.3%) | |
| T3 | 15 (50.0%) | |
| T4 | 11 (36.7%) | |
| Lymph node involvement | ||
| N0 | 15 (50.0%) | |
| N1 | 7 (23.3%) | |
| N2 | 8 (26.7%) | |
| Distant metastasis | ||
| M0 | 29 (96.7%) | |
| M1 | 1 (3.3%) |
Figure 5Verification of the serine proteases using MRM and TMA in individual human samples
A. The relative protein levels and ROC curves of the four serine proteases in human sera based on an MRM analysis. The protein peak area of one healthy control was used as the reference. * p≤0.05, ** p≤0.01, *** p≤0.001 (Mann-Whitney U test). Bars, median with interquartile range. The solid lines in the ROC curves represent the plot of 1-specificity versus sensitivity. B-C. Representative images (B) and statistical analysis (C) of TMA detection of CELA1 and CTRL in 80 pairs of human CRC and their adjacent tissues (N). *** p≤0.001 (Paired-Samples T test).
ROC analysis and diagnostic performance of the four serine proteases based on serum MRM detection
| Proteins | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CELA1 | 0.83 (95%CI, 0.72-0.93) | 60.0% | 93.3% | <0.001 |
| CEL2A | 0.87 (95%CI, 0.78-0.96) | 83.3% | 80.0% | <0.001 |
| CTRL | 0.87 (95%CI, 0.79-0.96) | 76.7% | 86.7% | <0.001 |
| TRY2 | 0.85 (95%CI, 0.75-0.94) | 80.0% | 76.7% | <0.001 |
| CELA1&CEL2A | 0.88 (95%CI, 0.80-0.97) | 96.7% | 66.7% | <0.001 |
| CELA1&CTRL | 0.90 (95%CI, 0.83-0.98) | 90.0% | 80.0% | <0.001 |
| CELA1&TRY2 | 0.90 (95%CI, 0.83-0.98) | 86.7% | 80.0% | <0.001 |
| CEL2A&CTRL | 0.90 (95%CI, 0.83-0.98) | 86.7% | 80.0% | <0.001 |
| CEL2A&TRY2 | 0.90 (95%CI, 0.83-0.98) | 86.7% | 80.0% | <0.001 |
| CTRL&TRY2 | 0.89 (95%CI, 0.82-0.97) | 83.3% | 83.3% | <0.001 |
| CELA1&CEL2A&CTRL | 0.90 (95%CI, 0.83-0.98) | 90.0% | 80.0% | <0.001 |
| CELA1&CEL2A&TRY2 | 0.89 (95%CI, 0.82-0.97) | 73.3% | 90.0% | <0.001 |
| CELA1&CTRL&TRY2 | 0.89 (95%CI, 0.82-0.97) | 83.3% | 80.0% | <0.001 |
| CEL2A&CTRL&TRY2 | 0.90 (95%CI, 0.83-0.97) | 86.7% | 80.0% | <0.001 |
| CELA1&CEL2A&CTRL&TRY2 | 0.90 (95%CI, 0.83-0.98) | 86.7% | 83.3% | <0.001 |
Clinical characteristics of CRC patients for TMA detection
| Characteristics | Colon cancer group (N=80) n (%) |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 47 (58.8%) |
| Female | 32 (40.0%) |
| Unknown | 1 (1.2%) |
| Age | |
| 21-40 | 3 (3.8%) |
| 41-60 | 20 (25.0%) |
| 61-80 | 50 (62.5%) |
| >80 | 5 (6.2%) |
| Unknown | 2 (2.5%) |
| Tumor size (cm) | |
| 2-4 | 28 (35.0%) |
| 4-6 | 36 (45.0%) |
| 6-8 | 11 (13.8%) |
| 8-10 | 4 (5.0%) |
| >10 | 1 (1.2%) |
| Depth of invasion | |
| T1 | 2 (2.5%) |
| T2 | 12 (15.0%) |
| T3 | 39 (48.8%) |
| T4 | 27 (33.7%) |
| Lymph node involvement | |
| N0 | 38 (47.5%) |
| N1 | 28 (35.0%) |
| N2 | 14 (17.5%) |
| Distant metastasis | |
| M0 | 68 (85.0%) |
| M1 | 12 (15.0%) |