Literature DB >> 27075538

Integration of sensory, spinal, and volitional descending inputs in regulation of human locomotion.

Yury Gerasimenko1, Parag Gad2, Dimitry Sayenko2, Zach McKinney3, Ruslan Gorodnichev4, Aleksandr Puhov4, Tatiana Moshonkina5, Aleksandr Savochin5, Victor Selionov6, Tatiana Shigueva7, Elena Tomilovskaya7, Inessa Kozlovskaya7, V Reggie Edgerton2.   

Abstract

We reported previously that both transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation and direct pressure stimulation of the plantar surfaces of the feet can elicit rhythmic involuntary step-like movements in noninjured subjects with their legs in a gravity-neutral apparatus. The present experiments investigated the convergence of spinal and plantar pressure stimulation and voluntary effort in the activation of locomotor movements in uninjured subjects under full body weight support in a vertical position. For all conditions, leg movements were analyzed using electromyographic (EMG) recordings and optical motion capture of joint kinematics. Spinal cord stimulation elicited rhythmic hip and knee flexion movements accompanied by EMG bursting activity in the hamstrings of 6/6 subjects. Similarly, plantar stimulation induced bursting EMG activity in the ankle flexor and extensor muscles in 5/6 subjects. Moreover, the combination of spinal and plantar stimulation exhibited a synergistic effect in all six subjects, eliciting greater motor responses than either modality alone. While the motor responses to spinal vs. plantar stimulation seems to activate distinct but overlapping spinal neural networks, when engaged simultaneously, the stepping responses were functionally complementary. As observed during induced (involuntary) stepping, the most significant modulation of voluntary stepping occurred in response to the combination of spinal and plantar stimulation. In light of the known automaticity and plasticity of spinal networks in absence of supraspinal input, these findings support the hypothesis that spinal and plantar stimulation may be effective tools for enhancing the recovery of motor control in individuals with neurological injuries and disorders.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central pattern generator; sensory stimulation of sole; spinal cord locomotion; spinal cord stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27075538      PMCID: PMC4961746          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00146.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Gait acts as a gate for reflexes from the foot.

Authors:  J Duysens; C M Bastiaanse; B C M Smits-Engelsman; V Dietz
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 2.273

2.  Plantar cutaneous input modulates differently spinal reflexes in subjects with intact and injured spinal cord.

Authors:  M Knikou
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Tonic central and sensory stimuli facilitate involuntary air-stepping in humans.

Authors:  V A Selionov; Y P Ivanenko; I A Solopova; V S Gurfinkel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Evidence for cutaneous and corticospinal modulation of presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents from the human lower limb.

Authors:  J F Iles
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Spinal Rhythm Generation by Step-Induced Feedback and Transcutaneous Posterior Root Stimulation in Complete Spinal Cord-Injured Individuals.

Authors:  Karen Minassian; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Simon M Danner; Winfried Mayr; Joy A Bruce; W Barry McKay; Keith E Tansey
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 6.  Significance of load receptor input during locomotion: a review.

Authors:  V Dietz; J Duysens
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  [Specifics of activation of cortex by stimulation of support receptors in healthy subjects and in patients with lesions of CNS].

Authors:  E I Kremneva; I V Saenko; L A Chernikova; A V Cherviakov; R N Konovalov; I B Kozlovskaia
Journal:  Fiziol Cheloveka       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct

8.  Effects of artificial support stimulation on fiber and molecular characteristics of soleus muscle in men exposed to 7-day dry immersion.

Authors:  K S Litvinova; I M Vikhlyantsev; I B Kozlovskaya; Z A Podlubnaya; B S Shenkman
Journal:  J Gravit Physiol       Date:  2004-07

9.  Locomotor-like movements evoked by leg muscle vibration in humans.

Authors:  V S Gurfinkel; Y S Levik; O V Kazennikov; V A Selionov
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Can the human lumbar posterior columns be stimulated by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation? A modeling study.

Authors:  Simon M Danner; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Josef Ladenbauer; Frank Rattay; Karen Minassian
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.094

View more
  18 in total

1.  Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Motor Function in Rats With Chemically Induced Parkinsonism.

Authors:  Hui Zhong; Chunni Zhu; Yoshihiko Minegishi; Franziska Richter; Sharon Zdunowski; Roland R Roy; Bryce Vissel; Parag Gad; Yury Gerasimenko; Marie-Francoise Chesselet; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.919

2.  Transcutaneous spinal stimulation alters cortical and subcortical activation patterns during mimicked-standing: A proof-of-concept fMRI study.

Authors:  Gerome Manson; Darryn A Atkinson; Zhaoyue Shi; Jony Sheynin; Christof Karmonik; Rachel L Markley; Dimitry G Sayenko
Journal:  Neuroimage Rep       Date:  2022-03-08

3.  Enabling respiratory control after severe chronic tetraplegia: an exploratory case study.

Authors:  Parag Gad; Evgeniy Kreydin; Hui Zhong; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  And yet it moves: Recovery of volitional control after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  G Taccola; D Sayenko; P Gad; Y Gerasimenko; V R Edgerton
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Non-Invasive Activation of Cervical Spinal Networks after Severe Paralysis.

Authors:  Parag Gad; Sujin Lee; Nicholas Terrafranca; Hui Zhong; Amanda Turner; Yury Gerasimenko; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Self-Assisted Standing Enabled by Non-Invasive Spinal Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Dimitry G Sayenko; Mrinal Rath; Adam R Ferguson; Joel W Burdick; Leif A Havton; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Characterization of interlimb interaction via transcutaneous spinal stimulation of cervical and lumbar spinal enlargements.

Authors:  Darryn A Atkinson; Alexander G Steele; Gerome A Manson; Jony Sheynin; Jeonghoon Oh; Yury P Gerasimenko; Dimitry G Sayenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Normalization of Blood Pressure With Spinal Cord Epidural Stimulation After Severe Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Susan J Harkema; Siqi Wang; Claudia A Angeli; Yangsheng Chen; Maxwell Boakye; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Glenn A Hirsch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Multimodal treatment for spinal cord injury: a sword of neuroregeneration upon neuromodulation.

Authors:  Ya Zheng; Ye-Ran Mao; Ti-Fei Yuan; Dong-Sheng Xu; Li-Ming Cheng
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 5.135

10.  Muscle Activation Patterns During Movement Attempts in Children With Acquired Spinal Cord Injury: Neurophysiological Assessment of Residual Motor Function Below the Level of Lesion.

Authors:  Darryn A Atkinson; Laura Mendez; Natalie Goodrich; Sevda C Aslan; Beatrice Ugiliweneza; Andrea L Behrman
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.