Literature DB >> 35320019

Characterization of interlimb interaction via transcutaneous spinal stimulation of cervical and lumbar spinal enlargements.

Darryn A Atkinson1,2, Alexander G Steele2,3, Gerome A Manson2,4, Jony Sheynin5, Jeonghoon Oh2, Yury P Gerasimenko6,7,8, Dimitry G Sayenko2.   

Abstract

The use of transcutaneous electrical spinal stimulation (TSS) to modulate sensorimotor networks after neurological insult has garnered much attention from both researchers and clinicians in recent years. Although many different stimulation paradigms have been reported, the interlimb effects of these neuromodulation techniques have been little studied. The effects of multisite TSS on interlimb sensorimotor function are of particular interest in the context of neurorehabilitation, as these networks have been shown to be important for functional recovery after neurological insult. The present study utilized a condition-test paradigm to investigate the effects of interenlargement TSS on spinal motor excitability in both cervical and lumbosacral motor pools. Additionally, comparison was made between the conditioning effects of lumbosacral and cervical TSS and peripheral stimulation of the fibular nerve and ulnar nerve, respectively. In 16/16 supine, relaxed participants, facilitation of spinally evoked motor responses (sEMRs) in arm muscles was seen in response to lumbosacral TSS or fibular nerve stimulation, whereas facilitation of sEMRs in leg muscles was seen in response to cervical TSS or ulnar nerve stimulation. The decreased latency between TSS- and peripheral nerve-evoked conditioning implicates interlimb networks in the observed facilitation of motor output. The results demonstrate the ability of multisite TSS to engage interlimb networks, resulting in the bidirectional influence of cervical and lumbosacral motor output. The engagement of interlimb networks via TSS of the cervical and lumbosacral enlargements represents a feasible method for engaging spinal sensorimotor networks in clinical populations with compromised motor function.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Bidirectional interlimb modulation of spinal motor excitability can be evoked by transcutaneous spinal stimulation over the cervical and lumbosacral enlargements. Multisite transcutaneous spinal stimulation engages spinal sensorimotor networks thought to be important in the recovery of function after spinal cord injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human neurophysiology; interlimb reflexes; propriospinal; spinal cord; transcutaneous spinal stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35320019      PMCID: PMC8993515          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00456.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  57 in total

1.  Long-loop reflex from arm afferents to remote muscles in normal man.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kagamihara; Akito Hayashi; Yoshihisa Masakado; Yutaka Kouno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats.

Authors:  Florence M Bareyre; Martin Kerschensteiner; Olivier Raineteau; Thomas C Mettenleiter; Oliver Weinmann; Martin E Schwab
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Neurophysiological assessment of spinal cord and head injury.

Authors:  M R Dimitrijevic; C Y Hsu; W B McKay
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  On the reflex mechanisms of cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in human subjects.

Authors:  Matija Milosevic; Yohei Masugi; Atsushi Sasaki; Dimitry G Sayenko; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Suprasegmentally induced motor unit activity in paralyzed muscles of patients with established spinal cord injury.

Authors:  M R Dimitrijevic; M M Dimitrijevic; J Faganel; A M Sherwood
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Cortico-reticulo-spinal circuit reorganization enables functional recovery after severe spinal cord contusion.

Authors:  Leonie Asboth; Lucia Friedli; Janine Beauparlant; Cristina Martinez-Gonzalez; Selin Anil; Elodie Rey; Laetitia Baud; Galyna Pidpruzhnykova; Mark A Anderson; Polina Shkorbatova; Laura Batti; Stephane Pagès; Julie Kreider; Bernard L Schneider; Quentin Barraud; Gregoire Courtine
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Central nervous system plasticity after spinal cord injury in man: interlimb reflexes and the influence of cutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  B Calancie; S Lutton; J G Broton
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-08

8.  Interlimb reflexes and synaptic plasticity become evident months after human spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Blair Calancie; Maria R Molano; James G Broton
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Human bipeds use quadrupedal coordination during locomotion.

Authors:  Volker Dietz; Jan Michel
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Vestibulospinal and Corticospinal Modulation of Lumbosacral Network Excitability in Human Subjects.

Authors:  Dimitry G Sayenko; Darryn A Atkinson; Amber M Mink; Katelyn M Gurley; V Reggie Edgerton; Susan J Harkema; Yury P Gerasimenko
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cervical transcutaneous spinal stimulation for spinal motor mapping.

Authors:  Jeonghoon Oh; Alexander G Steele; Blesson Varghese; Catherine A Martin; Michelle S Scheffler; Rachel L Markley; Yi-Kai Lo; Dimitry G Sayenko
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-08-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.