Lynn Shi1, Sharmila Dorbala2, Diana Paez3, Leslee J Shaw4, Katherine A Zukotynski5, Thomas N B Pascual3, Ganesan Karthikeyan6, João V Vitola7, Nathan Better8, Nadia Bokhari9, Madan M Rehani10, Ravi Kashyap3, Maurizio Dondi3, Mathew Mercuri9, Andrew J Einstein11. 1. College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York. 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Section of Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging, Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. 4. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, and Emory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 5. Departments of Medicine and Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 6. Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. 7. Quanta Diagnóstico & Terapia, Curitiba, Brazil. 8. Departments of Cardiology and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. 9. Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. 10. Radiation Protection of Patients Unit, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 11. Department of Medicine, Cardiology Division, Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York; Department of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York. Electronic address: andrew.einstein@columbia.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate gender-based differences in nuclear cardiology practice globally, with a particular focus on laboratory volume, radiation dose, protocols, and best practices. BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether gender-based differences exist in radiation exposure for nuclear cardiology procedures. METHODS: In a large, multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study encompassing 7,911 patients in 65 countries, radiation effective dose was estimated for each examination. Patient-level best practices relating to radiation exposure were compared between genders. Analysis of covariance was used to determine any difference in radiation exposure according to gender, region, and the interaction between gender and region. Linear, logistic, and hierarchical regression models were developed to evaluate gender-based differences in radiation exposure and laboratory adherence to best practices. The study also included the United Nations Gender Inequality Index and Human Development Index as covariates in multivariable models. RESULTS: The proportion of myocardial perfusion imaging studies performed in women varied among countries; however, there was no significant correlation with the Gender Inequality Index. Globally, mean effective dose for nuclear cardiology procedures was only slightly lower in women (9.6 ± 4.5 mSv) than in men (10.3 ± 4.5 mSv; p < 0.001), with a difference of only 0.3 mSv in a multivariable model adjusting for patients' age and weight. Stress-only imaging was performed more frequently in women (12.5% vs. 8.4%; p < 0.001); however, camera-based dose reduction strategies were used less frequently in women (58.6% vs. 65.5%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant worldwide variation in best practice use and radiation doses from nuclear cardiology procedures, only small differences were observed between genders worldwide. Regional variations noted in myocardial perfusion imaging use and radiation dose offer potential opportunities to address gender-related differences in delivery of nuclear cardiology care.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate gender-based differences in nuclear cardiology practice globally, with a particular focus on laboratory volume, radiation dose, protocols, and best practices. BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether gender-based differences exist in radiation exposure for nuclear cardiology procedures. METHODS: In a large, multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study encompassing 7,911 patients in 65 countries, radiation effective dose was estimated for each examination. Patient-level best practices relating to radiation exposure were compared between genders. Analysis of covariance was used to determine any difference in radiation exposure according to gender, region, and the interaction between gender and region. Linear, logistic, and hierarchical regression models were developed to evaluate gender-based differences in radiation exposure and laboratory adherence to best practices. The study also included the United Nations Gender Inequality Index and Human Development Index as covariates in multivariable models. RESULTS: The proportion of myocardial perfusion imaging studies performed in women varied among countries; however, there was no significant correlation with the Gender Inequality Index. Globally, mean effective dose for nuclear cardiology procedures was only slightly lower in women (9.6 ± 4.5 mSv) than in men (10.3 ± 4.5 mSv; p < 0.001), with a difference of only 0.3 mSv in a multivariable model adjusting for patients' age and weight. Stress-only imaging was performed more frequently in women (12.5% vs. 8.4%; p < 0.001); however, camera-based dose reduction strategies were used less frequently in women (58.6% vs. 65.5%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant worldwide variation in best practice use and radiation doses from nuclear cardiology procedures, only small differences were observed between genders worldwide. Regional variations noted in myocardial perfusion imaging use and radiation dose offer potential opportunities to address gender-related differences in delivery of nuclear cardiology care.
Authors: Raymond J Gibbons; Gary J Balady; J Timothy Bricker; Bernard R Chaitman; Gerald F Fletcher; Victor F Froelicher; Daniel B Mark; Ben D McCallister; Aryan N Mooss; Michael G O'Reilly; William L Winters; Raymond J Gibbons; Elliott M Antman; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Richard O Russell; Sidney C Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Francis J Klocke; Michael G Baird; Beverly H Lorell; Timothy M Bateman; Joseph V Messer; Daniel S Berman; Patrick T O'Gara; Blase A Carabello; Richard O Russell; Manuel D Cerqueira; Martin G St John Sutton; Anthony N DeMaria; James E Udelson; J Ward Kennedy; Mario S Verani; Kim Allan Williams; Elliott M Antman; Sidney C Smith; Joseph S Alpert; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jeffrey L Anderson; Loren F Hiratzka; David P Faxon; Sharon Ann Hunt; Valentin Fuster; Alice K Jacobs; Raymond J Gibbons; Richard O Russell Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-09-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Tali Sharir; Xingping Kang; Guido Germano; Jeroen J Bax; Leslee J Shaw; Heidi Gransar; Ishac Cohen; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Daniel S Berman; Xingping Kang; Sean W Hayes; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Aiden Abidov; Leslee J Shaw; Aman M Amanullah; Guido Germano; Rory Hachamovitch Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-04-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: C Noel Bairey Merz; Leslee J Shaw; Steven E Reis; Vera Bittner; Sheryl F Kelsey; Marian Olson; B Delia Johnson; Carl J Pepine; Sunil Mankad; Barry L Sharaf; William J Rogers; Gerald M Pohost; Amir Lerman; Arshed A Quyyumi; George Sopko Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-02-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; H Kiat; C N Bairey; I Cohen; A Cabico; J Friedman; G Germano; K F Van Train; G A Diamond Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1996-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Viviany R Taqueti; Sharmila Dorbala; David Wolinsky; Brian Abbott; Gary V Heller; Timothy M Bateman; Jennifer H Mieres; Lawrence M Phillips; Nanette K Wenger; Leslee J Shaw Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Ami E Iskandrian; Vasken Dilsizian; Ernest V Garcia; Rob S Beanlands; Manuel Cerqueira; Prem Soman; Daniel S Berman; Alberto Cuocolo; Andrew J Einstein; Charity J Morgan; Fadi G Hage; Heinrich R Schelbert; Jeroen J Bax; Joseph C Wu; Leslee J Shaw; Mehran M Sadeghi; Nagara Tamaki; Philipp A Kaufmann; Robert Gropler; Sharmila Dorbala; William Van Decker Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 5.952